Soaring Spirit


"In Simplicity Is All Truth" "Experience Is My Teacher" "Wisdom Is My Proof"

Nicolette Germano© LS

HIT JOB
                             Jeff Dougherty aka Sun Tzu, lied making false claims about me and Anna Von Reitz. Jeff attacked me in the back office at https://nesaranews.blogspot.com he was deleting my drafts and accusing me of the same things he made public in this hit job against me and Anna. I am so pleased to be in the top billing with Anna but let me assure you my knowledge, articles and applied efforts to expose the dark evil that has infiltrated our entire existence does not even come close to what Anna has done and accomplished so I’m wearing this hit job as a badge of honor. Jeff claims he and Destry Payne aka Freewill fed me info which I then gave to Anna. Anna does not even know who I am. We are not in contact with each other, she has no knowledge of me, but if she does I am unaware of it. I have been following Anna’s work for two or three years now and she is truly amazing. She has helped those of us that want the truth and to live by the truth, which in our current state of affairs we are in desperate need of.
Jeff uses this post to claim Destry fed me info. Whatever this post is it has no relation to me so I don’t know what he is claiming here. Destry has never given me any info as to his standing, nor have I ever passed any info concerning him to anyone else much less to Anna. Jeff accuses me of not viewing the video's  I posted, only a first hand witness could make a claim against me, which he is not. He does not know me, he does not sit at my desk, he is a fraud, a lier and like Destry they are destroyers. That accusation alone exposes Jeff. I have Jeff's complete hit job below, as well as links to Anna's articles on Jeff and Destry and I included what I was able to capture of my posts on nesara news. His claims are false and will be exposed.




There is a difference between the attacker and one having to defend oneself against an attacker. Anna countered Jeff’s hit job against her and exposed Jeff and Destry for who they truly are and what they are doing to counter all the great work she and I are doing to get the truth out and help all who want to be helped to get their correct standing and take our country back from the demons that want to destroy us.  [I find it interesting that if you simply add an o to Destry you have "Destroy"]
For all who are working to correct all the wrongs done against them by those like Jeff and all those we are now learning the truth about, stay strong, don’t give up because the same light that shines on us fighting back to stop this dark evil, is the same light that shines on all this dark evil.
After being attacked by Jeff in the back office of nesara news I posted my statement I knew this man was not right in his mind and I wanted to show what my intent was in posting what I posted on nesara news. Here is my origanal post:
https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2019/01/topic-view-point-nikki-g.html#more [You won't find this link because Jeff deleted most all my articles that I wrote. Sorry there is nothing I can do about that which is why I saved what I could. This is what comes up: https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/search?q=Topic+view+point+nikki+g ]
I stand in great company all of us being attacked ware badges of honor:














Thursday, January 10, 2019
[TOPIC VIEW POINT] Nikki G.

Everyone has their own preference as to what information they are interested in. My mind is open to listening to all sides of a story in order to compile a wider view of the subject like getting a bird’s eye view seeing the whole surroundings rather than only one side. So, there will be opposing views in these posts. Right now, people around this world are waking up and seeing their governments for what they truly are and they are upset. It is unfortunate that it has gotten as deeply corrupt and sadistic as it has because great violence is breaking out everywhere now.


American’s are doing their best to curtail the situation’s occurring here to prevent as much violence as possible but the dark forces want war so they are flooding our country with migrants just as they have done to nearly every other country. Do you find it interesting they are not flooding China? Or Russia? Or North Korea and the like? They are not because they know they would never get away with it in those countries.


All my posts tend to be relevant to today issues, i.e. Vaccine risks, Alternative Health, Q drops, migrant invasions, commentary from digital soldiers as Gen. Flynn calls them, so we can see what is going on in our world today from all sides. Also, I only post that which I listen to myself and most of the articles and video are from those journalists and other sources I have grown to trust or recommended by those I have grown to trust. Does that guarantee they are not shills? NO! I do not personally know all but a few. As I said I have grown to trust these sources, so as it is for all of us to determine if you trust them. We are all responsible to do our own research. It is the only way to learn if any source is reliable or not.


My Alternative articles are mine. I developed them by putting into practice all of my remedies, using them in my own life and have helped many others because they also chose to test them.


I have my favorite independent journalists like Lionel Nation because he is so funny and helps to ease the pain of what we are having to deal with today, and Field McConnell and others like him because they are directly involved and seem to have direct contacts to those fighting this war directly, and GrandSupreme, Black Conservative, Dimond & Silk and especially AnOmaly, because they prove that our youth are awake and standing up and speaking out against the horrors and atrocities being done against us all. Believe it or not AnOmaly is a democrat and very liberal although after his extreme rant against the new acting governor of California and his giving free health care to all migrants, he made it clear he can now understand why those of us conservatives are so opposed to it.


Each of the articles and video’s I post are full of many topics. Each has their own views and most try to include their sources.
2014 proved to be the turning point for Americans. We knew we were being ruled by very bad creatures so when Donald Trump came into the mix and spoke out against all the atrocities on open mike it was not only a punch in the face of the deep state actors but an awakening for the whole world. I am amazed of the over whelming hopes, prayers and support we here are getting from the entire world and how Trump has given cause for other countries to stand up and take their countries back. Let’s not forget who got this ball rolling: Iceland
Iceland open the doors to who was the problem and they took their country back. That started the snow ball and it has not stopped. Much gratitude is owed Icelanders for their great courage!


As we allow ourselves to see this life and world as it truly is, we will learn and grow which is vital to our survival and remember it is on each of us to take a stand in this war, because our children will have a worse nightmare than the one, we are currently going through if we do not. And remember we are not fighting this alone! Our own military could not take the depths to where this country was being taken, so they devised a plan and we all are watching that plan play out today. May all creation give gratitude to all those who are working hard to save our world!


Point being if you are not aware your neighbor is planning to break into your home and rob you and possibly worse, you will have no defense against him, or as my dear ole dad would say “If you want a car you better be prepared to maintain it”.
I have also posted relaxing music from around the world and scenic views to help remind us this is truly a beautiful World and it is worth saving not just for us now but for all future generations and because we all need a break from it all.


I will be working on making my posts to be more viewer friendly, so there will be less posts but retaining the content of the different anon’s, patriots, commentaries, and such. Hope and prayers are vital but it is our actions that will determine wither or not we save our planet.


Note: This is a quote from a friend of mine: "we must unite [in peace] to create the change we want"
May we ALL be blessed and may our blessings be eternally unbroken.
Nikki G.

Posted by Soaring Spirit
Here is what Jeff said about my work on nesara news, my style of posting had not changed until I was told to change by Jeff:
https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2018/12/soaring-spirit-excellent-work-keep-it.html
It is written:
Revelation 18:4
And I heard another voice from Heaven saying, Come out from within her, my people, so that you do not partake in her sins, so that you do not receive of her plagues,
John 8:31-36
And Yeshua said to those Judeans who had faith in him, If you will remain in my word, you are truly my talmidim. 32, And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. 33. They said to him, We are the seed of Avraham and bondage has not ever been served by us to any man. How do you say, You will be free men? 34, Yeshua said to them, Truly, Truly I say to you that whoever does sin is a servant of sin. 35, And the servant does not abide in the house forever, but the son abides forever. 36, If then the son frees you, you will truly be free men.
Please use the gift of discernment to wade through the false and hold only to the truth.
The light of truth is finally being seen by the whole world. All that is dark and evil will suffer the pain of truth and all who live by the truth will enjoy the blessings of the light of truth.
Many blessings, may they flow eternally unbroken. Nicolette Germano© LS


This Q post fits the hit job done on me and anna to a tee! Jeff and Destry can’t destroy us so they lie and misinform those reading nesara news but the real cabal agents are Jeff and Destry. Wake up learn the truth so that this kind of trash does not take you down the same road Jeff and Destry are going!
https://qmap.pub/ 

3312

Attacks on Q Will Intensify as the Deep State is Targeted; Q Has the Source (Julian Assange?)
Q!!mG7VJxZNCI11 Apr 2019 - 11:34:08 AM
If we are merely a LARP asking questions on the Chans, why are we being attacked daily by some of the world's biggest media co's, social media co's deliberately applying censorship/banning, shills paid/inserted to disrupt (media matters), blue checkmark coordinated attacks, etc.?
All for a 'conspiracy' on the Chans?
All for a 'LARP'?
Why is there a constant flow of disinformation being pushed re: Q?
Example:
Disinformation push re: Mueller is a white hat.
FAKE & FALSE narrative.
Think BLOCKADE.
When you can't attack the information directly, you attack the source, if that fails, you 'create false misleading information' to discredit knowing 'select' 'unaware' followers would not take the time to self-corroborate the claims (same vehicle/tactics used by FAKE NEWS media).
Logical thinking always wins.
Nothing can stop what is coming.
As the target(s) turn to the other side, the attacks will intensify.
We have the source.
Q



Thursday, October 11, 2018
New publisher for nesaranews!


Please welcome Soaring Spirit! She shares many interesting articles and will be a great addition to nesaranews.
Posted by Freewill at 5:39:00 PM


Sun TzuDecember 30, 2018 at 5:02 PM
Thank you very much for the compliment! I appreciate you and your kind words more than you can ever know. And without Soaring Spirit holding up Freewill and I, there would not have been much happening here while Freewill and I were down and out, Soaring Spirit has been kicking some real Crime Syndicate Butt.
Thank you so much for your valued readership and for contributing here at Nesara News!

Sincerely,

Sun Tzu
Posted in comment section on nesara news


https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/search?q=soaring+spirit   


https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/search?q=Anna+Von+Reitz+Soaring+Spirit  


Anna’s articles concerning Destry Payne and Jeff Dougherty

https://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Destry
http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Destry&updated-max=2019-03-06T17:25:00-07:00&max-results=20&start=17&by-date=false
http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Destry&updated-max=2019-05-05T17:39:00-06:00&max-results=20&start=13&by-date=false
http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Destry&updated-max=2019-02-17T13:22:00-07:00&max-results=20&start=26&by-date=false


http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Jeff+Dougherty

http://www.paulstramer.net/search?q=Jeff+Dougherty&updated-max=2019-03-06T17:25:00-07:00&max-results=20&start=6&by-date=false





Jeff Dougherty's Hit Job on Anna and me:

Saturday, March 2, 2019
Anna Von Reitz & Soaring Spirit - STING OPERATION - CABAL AGENTS EXPOSED - Forgiveness Is The Most Important Asset Moving Forward
A recent sting operation exposed both Soaring Spirit (a former Contributor at Nesara News), and Anna Von Reitz as both being Cabal Agents.


The first discovery was evidence against Soaring Spirit exposing her as an agent attempting to disrupt the exposing of "The Great Fraud," here at Nesara News.


Any day that Nesara News would post info about the Jural Assemblies or about the "Foreign Owned Corporation, "United States Inc," Soaring Spirit would then upload 20 to 40 videos per day (most being of very poor content) that it would spam the important articles back several pages of "Older Posts," making it difficult to get information out to people, because nobody wants to sift through pages after pages of worthless videos to find a buried written article.


This was the same disruption that Olive Oil (previous contributor) and Popeye (previous contributor) had previously performed for the Cabal. It was just before Freewill was sentenced to over 50 days in jail, that Freewill and I decided to delete the contributor privileges for Popeye and Olive Oil.


Days after deleting their privileges, a new individual showed up posting lots of great articles on the forums at National Assembly, she would later choose the name "Soaring Spirit" after Freewill got out of jail and gave her limited contributor status for posting on Nesara News.


The quality of Soaring Spirits content soon devalued quickly. She started posting lots of annoying YouTube videos (20 to 40 per day) that just had people gabbing with very limited actual intel.


We were able to expose Soaring Spirit as being a Cabal Operative by having a meeting with her, where we asked her to only post videos that she had actually watched in total entirety (which she responded saying, "I watch each of the videos I post, all the way through"), and we asked her to write two to three sentences for each video, explaining what the important, "Intelligence" gained from the video was.


Countless attempts were made to get Soaring Spirit to write any text along with her posted videos, she refused to write any summary at all, we concluded that she was not watching the videos (20 to 40 videos per day, most over an hour long), there simply is not enough time in any given day, and because the videos were worthless gab, we finally knew who she was and what her mission was, "To Disrupt The Flow of Information Exposing the Foreign Owned, "United States Inc," and to Disrupt The Flow of Information Informing The Public To Form Their Jural Assemblies.


Once we had determined beyond any doubt that Soaring Spirit was a Cabal Operative, and because Anna Von Reitz had recently veered off from her original course, where she originally whole heartedly supported the Michigan Jural Assembly (her words: "Michigan did everything exactly right"), then all of a sudden Anna Von Reitz veered off course, telling everyone, "That in order to join the Jural Assemblies, everyone HAD TO REPUDIATE THEIR U.S. CITIZENSHIP."


That coupled with the knowledge that students of Anna, that we call the "Colorado 9" (a group of nine "Judges") were arrested by FBI, some of them still in jail, but before the FBI arrested them, the FBI visited Anna Von Reitz in Alaska, after which she immediately removed the title "Judge" from her name, but she did not call and warn her students to do the same, and so they were arrested a short time later. Anna Von Reitz set them up for arrest and imprisonment, and she totally had the opportunity to save them from that fate, they were after all her students, they used the title, "Judge," because she taught them to do it.


After both Soaring Spirit and Anna Von Reitz were determined to be Cabal Agents. A sting operation was concocted, whereby information was provided to "Soaring Spirit," in order to see if that information would be provided to Anna Von Reitz, and be published in Anna's articles. The intelligence communities sometimes call this type of sting operation, "Beryllium Pebbles," meaning that if you take something "radioactive," you can use a geiger counter or satellite technology to track that radioactive signal in real time. There are two ways the intelligence community does this, the first is to feed a piece of information to a source(s) and see where that information reemerges from, the second method, is to take fine radioactive dust and scatter it on the ground, the specialized satellites can then track the radioactive footprints of any individuals who step on the radioactive dust (known to kill animals that accidentally lick or sniff the ground).


Freewill fed Soaring Spirit information, via email from his "contentmanager1@yahoo.com" email account, that he (Freewill) had obtained his diplomatic immunity via the "Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (you do not need to be a diplomat to get diplomatic protection, anyone can utilize this)," to protect himself against unlawful arrest by the de facto foreign owned corporation, "United States Inc," and Freewill told Soaring Spirit that he filed his paperwork in the Netherlands.


Four hours later... Anna Von Reitz published a hit piece article on "Freewill." Anna Von Reitz called "Freewill" a NWO Cabal operative & saying Freewill has dual citizenship in NETHERLANDS, and U.S."


Anna Von Reitz then instructed all supporters and Jural Assembly members to run away from "Freewill," and everything he is a part of, which means Anna is telling everyone, to run away from the Michigan Jural Assembly, and to run away from the National Assembly, which Freewill is the Comms Secretary for, and Freewill works closely with both groups, despite his recent moving away from Michigan (where he was a member of the Michigan Jural Assembly).


Freewill is a PATRIOT and a major moving force in the erection of the Jural Assemblies, Freewill & Others, are following in the footsteps of our American Forefathers & The American Framers, to take back our nation from the foreign enemy who's invaded our shores and enslaved us all.
PLEASE NOTE: Anna's Articles do not have dates, there is a logical reason for this, it is not good.






















Here is the link (for as long as it lasts, she will probably pull it down when she discovers she is exposed, thats okay, "screenshots are forever"):
http://annavonreitz.com/justconfirmed.pdf


Thus these two Cabal Agents (Anna Von Reitz & Soaring Spirit, have been fully exposed, showing their true colors, & Their TRUE mission, "DISRUPT AND DISMANTLE THE JURAL ASSEMBLIES, and weaken all key members erecting the Jural Assemblies.


In Closing:
"Freewill" and I (Sun Tzu) both agree firmly, that the Cabal ruins and hurts everyone that it touches. When the Cabal does not have dirt to use as ammunition, they threaten life, and much worse, the Cabal tortures, the Cabal murders, the Cabal has more ways to bend people to their will then the dictionary has words.


Thus, Freewill and I ask you all to be very understanding, and very forgiving, for both Anna Von Reitz, and Soaring Spirit. We do not know if they did it for money, or if they were threatened, but we know one thing for sure, no one would need to do anything bad... for money... if the Cabal was not first forcing us to live in a world of lacking resources, in which the fruits of our labor are stolen from us by every second of the day, our foods are poisoned, our air is poisoned, constant schemes to steal our bank accounts, to steal crypto currencies (scam), to steal our stocks (Stock Market =SCAM), to steal our bonds (murder/fraud), to steal our Nation (foreign owned "United States Inc,") and the Cabal New World Order Crime Syndicate will stop at nothing to save itself, so we all must learn to forgive our fellow brothers and sisters....


As soon as Anna Von Reitz and Soaring Spirit are ready to be devout Children of Earth and to fight for FREEDOM from Tyranny & Genocide, WE WELCOME THEN AGAIN, BACK INTO THE FOLD. We would ask them to answer a few questions though, in honor of Good Faith, moving forward.


Until then, everyone everywhere should be informed that any and all continued information from Anna Von Reitz requiring that citizens repudiate their U.S. Citizenship in order to form the Jural Assemblies is FALSE. You can if you want to, but you do not have to, and life without a driver's license, without a passport, without a bank account, is a one way ticket to live under a bridge and get thrown in jail every time you drive, or any time you try to do anything at all.


That is why the Cabal wants you to repudiate your U.S. Citizenship, because no one will say anything when the Cabal kills a bum living under a bridge (do not let that be you).


Below is the email, Freewill sent to me this morning of his email conversation with Soaring Spirit, I cannot post the whole contents because both Freewill's real name as well as Soaring Spirits email address would be exposed. But what I can show you is the email sent to me, its attachments, and photo of the file contents, i replaced Soaring Spirits email with "@@@@@@@@@.net," and you can see below where Freewill tells Soaring spirit that his paperwork for diplomatic immunity is filed in the Netherlands.

















Follow "The Handbook" as found on:
www.National-Assembly.Net


Erect Your Jural Assemblies, Now Is The Time, & Not Much Time Left
Posted by Sun Tzu at 9:02:00 PM
Sunday, March 3, 2019
Anna Von Reitz - Cabal Agent Exposed - Anna Von Reitz CALLS BeforeItsNews.Com & Nesara News Controlled Opposition (WE ARE MOST CERTAINLY OPPOSED TO YOUR (ANNA'S) CABAL NWO MASTERS) - written by Sun Tzu
Here is Anna Von Reitz's response to being exposed by the recent sting operation, exposing both her and Soaring Spirit as being Cabal New World Order Agents spreading disinformation and increasing profits for the Vatican & Vatican owned foreign corporation crime syndicate, "United Nations Inc," and Anna Von Reitz increases profits for the foreign owned corporation, "United States Inc."


By getting natives in every nation on Earth to repudiate their citizenships, Anna Von Reitz is decreasing the liabilities and increasing the profits for the de facto foreign owned crime syndicates.


Federal Statutes for every nation forbid each nation's crime syndicate from communicating & having business with non-fictional entities (in other words the "United States Inc," foreign owned corporation can only have comms and business dealings with, "Corporations.") which means as soon as you dissolve "YOUR CORPORATION," by repudiating your U.S. Citizenship (or your citizenship of wherever you live) the foreign owned corporation enslaving you, example being, "United States Inc," can now pretend you do not exist, and is forbid from even communicating with you.


Not only that, but after you repudiate your citizenship, good luck getting a bank account, driver's license, flying on commercial air traffic, or any other services that you need to survive. Repudiating your citizenship will destroy your life, and make you easy to kill (disappear) that is why Anna Von Reitz wants you to repudiate your citizenship, to ERASE YOU.


We do not need to repudiate our citizenships in order to "peaceably assemble" as protected by our Bill of Rights, and its First Amendment.


The American Forefathers and the Framers were also unlawfully converted into corporations by the British & French & Spanish parent corporations, nothing new since ancient Rome enslaved the world, which Rome still is doing today, as the Vatican owns everything (not Payseur as Qanon says).


Here is the sting operation that exposed Anna Von Reitz as a Cabal operative (although many Anons knew for a very long time):
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2019/03/anna-von-reitz-soaring-spirit-sting.html 














Here is the link to Anna's WEB OF LIES:
http://annavonreitz.com/goodbyemgja.pdf 
The rest of Anna's New World Order Psy-OP is here:
http://www.annavonreitz.com/ 


Anna is doing the same thing the Angry Child Murdering Democrats do, "define PROJECTION":


Anna Von Reitz projects false truths on others, to protect the exposed truths about her.


hat is the penalty for Treason Anna? You should know, GITMO will be your home soon.

Define Projection:
The attribution of one's own ideas, feelings or attitudes to other people or to objects; ESPECIALLY: THE EXTERNALIZATION OF BLAME, GUILT, OR RESPONSIBILITY AS A DEFENSE AGAINST ANXIETY.


Define Psychological Projection:
"in Psychology, the theory describing how the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive & negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others."


Anna Von Reitz got her own students arrested by telling them to use the title, "Judge" and after the FBI visited Anna Von Reitz, Anna removed the title "Judge" from her name, but Anna did not call and warn her 9 students in Colorado, who were all days later arrested for using the title, "Judge" in their name, many of them are still in prison.


Even if what Anna say is TRUE (which it is not) in her "Psychological Projection"(Anna's article above), then Anna Von Reitz would still be a horrible teacher of disinformation for teaching her 9 Colorado students to use the title Judge, which got them arrested and imprisoned, by the foreign owned de facto crime syndicate corporation, "United States Inc." So it is obvious that Anna is either spreading disinformation (bad information being taught) or she is a lier, NEITHER ARE GOOD, and if you've read about the sting operation (link provided again below:) then you know the truth is BOTH, Anna Von Reitz is both a LIER and a purveyor of FALSE INFORMATION.


Sting Operation Exposing Anna Von Reitz as a Cabal New World Order Crime Syndicate AGENT:
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2019/03/anna-von-reitz-soaring-spirit-sting.html 


Anna, whatever the Cabal has on you. Just come clean with us, and cease your attacks against the Jural Assemblies. Anna, you are attacking the very fabric that our Founding American Forefathers wove in order to kick KING GEORGE out of America, do you really want to be remembered as one of the biggest TRAITORS ever in the history of our nation, and the of the world?


Cease your attacks, desist your purveying of damaging(deadly) instructions (U.S. Citizenship Repudiation) that will cause every one of your victims to end up under a bridge or in a jail cell, destitute, without a bank account, arrested every time they drive, and instead, aid us (Jural Assemblies) in understanding who your handlers are so that they can be brought to justice.


Anna, do this, and all will be forgiven, for we all understand that the Crime Syndicate is very convincing through their threats to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, the Cabal wields evil to enslave, we can forgive you, if you can forgive yourself, and then Anna, you must speedily come to aid the forces of light against PURE EVIL.


Otherwise, Anna Von Reitz, Guantanimo Bay Detention Facility awaits your speedy arrival.


Sincerely,
Sun Tzu
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com 
Posted by Sun Tzu at 7:44:00 PM


Sunday, December 30, 2018
SOARING SPIRIT - EXCELLENT WORK - KEEP IT UP - Godspeed PATRIOT! - Sincerely Sun Tzu


WAY TO GO - SOARING SPIRIT - !
Posted by Sun Tzu at 10:05:00 PM


Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Sovereignty… What does it actually mean?


Sovereignty… What does it actually mean?


SOVEREIGN, adjective suv'eran. [We retain this babarous orthography from the Norman sovereign The true spelling would be suveran from the Latin supernes, superus.]
1. Supreme in power; possessing supreme dominion; as a sovereign ruler of the universe.
2. Supreme; superior to all others; chief. God is the sovereign good of all who love and obey him.
3. Supremely efficacious; superior to all others; predominant; effectual; as a sovereign remedy.
4. Supreme; pertaining to the first magistrate of a nation; as sovereign authority.
SOVEREIGN, noun suv'eran.
1. A supreme lord or ruler; one who possesses the highest authority without control. Some earthly princes, kings and emperors are sovereigns in their dominions.
2. A supreme magistrate; a king.
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Sovereign 


Here is what being sovereign means to me. I am Lord, Owner and God over my mind, body, soul, spirit and all that I own, hold true, think and desire my life to be. That there is only one true law: DO NO HARM, and as long as I fulfill this law no one has any rights to overthrow my world. If anyone does trespass my world it is Treason.


TREASON, noun tree'zn. [Latin traho]
TREASON is the highest crime of a civil nature of which a man can be guilty. Its signification is different in different countries. In general, it is the offense of attempting to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance, or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power. In monarchies, the killing of the king, or an attempt to take his life, is treason In England, to imagine or compass the death of the king, or of the prince, or of the queen consort, or of the heir apparent of the crown, is high treason; as are many other offenses created by statute.
In the United States, treason is confined to the actual levying of war against the United States, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
TREASON in Great Britain, is of two kinds, high treason and petit treason High treason is a crime that immediately affects the king or state; such as the offenses just enumerated. Petit treason involves a breach of fidelity, but affects individuals. Thus for a wife to kill her husband, a servant his master or lord, or an ecclesiastic his lord or ordinary, is petit treason But in the United States this crime is unknown; the killing in the latter cases being murder only.
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Treason 


Nikki G.


NOTE TO SELF
We need to recognize we are not just a group of people coming together to chat rant or even rage about what is going on. We are the forefathers of this great land coming together to re-claim our Republican form of government. We are the formers/founders of the California Republic.
We are standing in the shoes of those that came before us that established the California Republic. Because most if not all the work has already been done all we need to do is comprehend our place in it re-forming or re-filling the offices of the California Republic seats which are still standing but no longer occupied.
We need to comprehend our sovereignty, our equality, sovereign= nothing greater above nothing lesser below, equals in mind, body, soul and spirit.
We must also comprehend that we are not all on the same level of knowledge and help each other to advance so we will all be on the same page of the work ahead of us and each of us must take responsibility for ourselves to study all that we need to learn and show up, be involved working together to complete our goals to bring California Republic back to its glory.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men [woman, humans, beings, Living Souls, etc.] are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”


Unalienable
UNA'LIENABLE, adjective Not alienable; that cannot be alienated; that may not be transferred; as unalienable rights.
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/unalienable 
It is our honor and our duty to work together to be at our best to not only fill the offices but to be honorable, trust worthy and responsible for the task ahead and onward. We need to grow up and recognize what we are intending to do and then do it.
We are the mentors of the next generation that will be taking over our places in this great work. Take this to heart. Wake up and realize our responsibility. Realize we are now creating/re-creating the desires of our forebears that wanted true freedom from the tyrannical monsters that were taking over, but oops THEY DID TAKE OVER and now it is up to us to TAKE IT BACK.


Nikki G.


HONOR AS AN ASSEMBLY JUROR


HON'OR, noun on'or
A testimony of esteem; any expression of respect or of high estimation by words or actions; as the honors of war; military honors; funeral honors; civil honors.
Dignity; exalted rank or place; distinction.
Reputation; good name; as, his honor is unsullied.
True nobleness of mind; magnanimity; dignified respect for character, springing from probity, principle or moral rectitude; a distinguishing trait in the character of good men.

http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Honor


INTEG'RITY, noun
Wholeness; entireness; unbroken state. The constitution of the U.States guaranties to each state the integrity of its territories. The contracting parties guarantied the integrity of the empire.
The entire, unimpaired state of any thing, particularly of the mind; moral soundness or purity; incorruptness; uprightness; honesty. integrity comprehends the whole moral character, but has a special reference to uprightness in mutual dealings, transfers of property, and agencies for others.
The moral grandeur of independent integrity is the sublimest thing in nature, before which the pomp of eastern magnificence and the splendor of conquest are odious as well as perishable.
Purity; genuine, unadulterated, unimpaired state; as the integrity of language.

http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Integrity


RIGHTEOUSNESS, noun ri'chusness
Purity of heart and rectitude of life; conformity of heart and life to the divine law. righteousness as used in Scripture and theology, in which it is chiefly used, is nearly equivalent to holiness, comprehending holy principles and affections of heart, and conformity of life to the divine law. It includes all we call justice, honesty and virtue, with holy affections; in short, it is true religion.

http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Righteousness


TRUTH, noun
Conformity to fact or reality; exact accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be. The truth of history constitutes its whole value.
True state of facts or things. The duty of a court of justice is to discover the truth Witnesses are sworn to declare the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
Veracity; purity from falsehood; practice of speaking truth; habitual disposition to speak truth.
Real fact of just principle; real state of things.

http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Truth


JU'ROR, noun [Latin jurator; or rather juro, to swear.]
One that serves on a jury; one sworn to deliver the truth on the evidence given him concerning any matter in question or on trial.
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary 


When we fail to live by these principals we fail our own existence, we fail all that exists. When we use words to falsely accuse another we dishonor ourselves and cause great harm to another.


FALSELY, adverb fols'ly
In a manner contrary to truth and fact; not truly; as, to speak or swear falsely; to testify falsely.
Treacherously; perfidiously.

http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Falsely


We commit perjury


PER'JURY, noun [Latin perjurium.] The act or crime of willfully making a false oath, when lawfully administered; or a crime committed when a lawful oath is administered in some judicial proceeding, to a person who swears willfully, absolutely and falsely in a matter material to the issue.
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Perjury


We harm others by falsely accusing them with Libel, Defamation of character and slander, damaging their reputations.


LI'BEL, noun [Latin libellus, a little book, from liber, a book, from the sense of bark, and this from stripping separating. Hence liber, a book, and liber, free, are the same word.]
A defamatory writing, Latin libellus, famosus. Hence, the epithet being omitted, libel expresses the same thing. Any book, pamphlet, writing or picture, containing representations, maliciously made or published, tending to bring a person into contempt, or expose him to public hatred and derision. The communication of such defamatory writing to a single person, is considered in law a publication. It is immaterial with respect to the essence of a libel whether the matter of it is true or false, since the provocation and not the falsity is the thing to be punished criminally. But in a civil action, a libel must appear to be false, as well as scandalous.


DEFAMATION, noun The uttering of slanderous words with a view to injure another’s reputation; the malicious uttering of falsehood respecting another which tends to destroy or impair his good name, character or occupation; slander; calumny. To constitute defamation in law, the words must be false and spoken maliciously. Defamatory words written and published are called a libel.


SLA'NDER, noun
A false tale or report maliciously uttered. and tending to injure the reputation of another by lessening him in the esteem of his fellow citizens, by exposing him to impeachment and punishment, or by impairing his means of lining; defamation. slander that worst of poisons, ever finds an easy entrance to ignoble minds.
Disgrace; reproach; disreputation; ill name.
SLA'NDER, verb transitive To defame; to injure by maliciously uttering a false report respecting one; to tarnish or impair the reputation of one by false tales, maliciously told or propagated.


WISDOM, noun
The right use or exercise of knowledge; the choice of laudable ends, and of the best means to accomplish them. This is wisdom in act, effect, or practice. If wisdom is to be considered as a faculty of the mind, it is the faculty of discerning or judging what is most just, proper and useful, and if it is to be considered as an acquirement, it is the knowledge and use of what is best, most just, most proper, most conducive to prosperity or happiness. wisdom in the first sense, or practical wisdom is nearly synonymous with discretion. It differs somewhat from prudence, in this respect; prudence is the exercise of sound judgment in avoiding evils; wisdom is the exercise of sound judgment either in avoiding evils or attempting good. Prudence then is a species, of which wisdom is the genus.
WISDOM gained by experience, is of inestimable value.
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Wisdom


“In Simplicity is All Truth*Experience is my Teacher*Wisdom is my Proof”


Nikki G.


[Note: I think it is important here for all of us to comprehend that Donald J. Trump was elected by the people for the Presidency of "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". But what most may not realize is "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA", is actually a foreign for profit corporation. Here is Title 28 U.S. Code 3002:
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States””
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002  Line 15


So Donald J. Trump is the COO of this foreign corporation, and he is keeping his promises by cleaning the swamp of that foreign for profit corporation and we can only hope to see it wiped completely clean so we can restore what this countries founders intended, which is our Republican form of governance. The same applies to all our states. You see all: "STATE OF", i.e. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, etc., are also ALL corporations and need all of us to wake up, comprehend the truth and take back our sovereignty, as Trump has stated repeatedly, and re-claim our Republican form of governance over our nation states.


One way of doing this is to join our National Assemblies by going to: https://theamericanstatesassembly.net/ find your state and become a member. Nikki G.]


Two Maxims of Law
• A piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their ownership.
• A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 7:40:00 PM


Wednesday, December 5, 2018
HONOR DOES NOT MIX WITH DISHONOR, Nikki G. POTUS & FLOTUS not participating in this evil. [Bush SR Funeral]


Please feel free to share these newsletters. They are a product of Global Genius Trust www.ggtrust.com 



Q 2553
POTUS NOT SINGING OFF THEIR HYMNBOOK

POTUS FLOTUS not participating in this evil.
>>4166910 One man, who gave up everything, risking his life (himself/family), to fight for & defend, We, the PEOPLE. Bait expends ammunition. EVIL has no place here.
Q


HONOR DOES NOT MIX WITH DISHONOR, Nikki G.
POTUS & FLOTUS: HONOR
ALL THE REST: DISHONOR


Posted by Soaring Spirit at 5:21:00 PM


Monday, December 24, 2018
Destroying the Illusion: Best Ways to DETOX!...plus Safe Cleansing Tea & Cleansing Baths from Nikki G.


Destroying the Illusion

Wednesday, December 5, 2018
Think nothing is happening? Then you are definitely not awake! MSM GLOBAL TRUTH BLACKOUT


Combine this report with these two reports at: NesaraNews and be prepared to have your socks knocked off. Nikki G.


SGTreport


Get the Patriot Flashlight NOW and SAVE 25% w/ promo code: SGT25 https://ruggedreserves.net/sales-page-25741086  We have reached the quickening of the global great awakening. From the United States to France to Germany and Italy, people around the world are beginning to recognize the agenda of the New World Order globalist puppets, and they are actively resisting it. And the mainstream media is doing its best to ignore it. FIGHT for truth. FIGHT for JUSTICE. FIGHT for the REPUBLIC. Now. Please consider supporting SGT Report on Patreon with a monthly contribution: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5104183  For REAL news 24/7: https://sgtreport.com/ https://thephaser.com/ https://thelibertymill.com/ 


Posted by Soaring Spirit at 8:26:00 AM


Monday, November 26, 2018
RE: the Tenth Amendment

click here to read: The Organic Constitution

Vrooman---

Very elegant in presentation you provided below. I trust you enjoyed the holiday.

But as well written and constructed as it is, are we not viewing more words on various types of media to express a view by Mr. Coxe

Tench Coxe was a prominent advocate for ratification and a delegate for Pennsylvania to the Continental Congress in 1788-1789.
He later served as Secretary of the Treasury. He wrote three essays published in the Pennsylvania Gazette in early 1788 under the
pen-name “A Freeman.” In these essays, Coxe offered some of the most forceful arguments asserting the limited nature of the federal
government under the proposed Constitution.

However, vrooman, while it sounds nice, and may seem reasonable, I am sure there are those Americans — sovereign Americans,
who recognize these views as well as the various versions of documents — any documents for that matter are essentially on their
own — null and void. That is unless the current living and breathing sovereign Americans, themselves, grant their consent to recognize
and agree to live by the intent.

Certainly the people, are not bound by any previous or even current commitments made by any individual or entity, public, fictitious or
PPP unless they were processed through legitimate due process. And those who claim legitimacy, and choose to act with no lawful
delegated authority, are impostors.

Consider if you will...
Legal System – NULL AND VOID! – Rules NOT Laws –

So what explains the behavior of the American people, to simply accept what they are being told, by few if any who are
anything but criminals, impersonating lawful representatives of the people?

A simple test conducted by any American sovereign — begins the process of verification.
An American sovereign asks; Who Are You?
And vrooman - as you have attempted to demonstrate on many occasions, your efforts to invoke the lawful process is almost always ignored by those with whom
you chose to interact. And in my view, any public officer, posing as a legitimate public officers who fails to respond to any legitimate order or request, demonstrates
for all to see that they are impostors.

No legitimate public officer can refuse to obey a lawful order. Why would they?
Free-Will Choice
They swore an oath, to do so and they gave their voluntary consent and they consummated the employment contract when accepting any emollient from the people —
the only lawful authority in America.

The people are endowed by their CREATOR as the sovereign living beings; just because we are alive.


A sovereign being!
Sovereignty!
Mr. Trump confirmed and officially recognized the people are sovereign…and he even went so far as to give global notice of his personal recognition.

***GLOBAL NOTICE*** Highest Administrative Authority in America Recognizes “We the People,” are Sovereign!

Please feel free to correct me as you might see fit… if you believe I am wrong...

But unless I am in error…?

About what is there to further discuss?

For those who agree…is it now time to begin to establish, identify and criminally charge those, by whom their failure to act in response to their lawful obligations to
honor the Constitution? GOT HONOR?

break the chain – Attention Mr. Trump!
Trumps hands are tied—Yours are not!
arnie
scannedretina.com


added by Nikki G


RESTORING THE REPUBLIC AND THE ORGANIC CONSTITUTION
Awakening Liberty Show
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 8:39:00 AM


Sunday, November 18, 2018
Here's a Thought!...


Here's a Thought!


I Think
Therefore
I AM...First expressed in French by René Descartes, a 17th century French philosopher, as je pense donc je suis.


Let's expand on that thought!


I Think
Therefore
I AM....accountable for my own choices!


I Think
Therefore
I AM....responsible for my own actions!


I Think
Therefore
I AM....Liable for all harm I cause!


Now lets apply this thought to ALL the actions of the Liberals, Migrants, ANTIFA drug cartels, human traffickers, etc. and to ALL those who are terrorizing and destroying our lives today! Nikki G.
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 8:02:00 PM
Monday, October 29, 2018
Benjamin Fulford report: Message to the banking elite: Trick or treat


This is a partial report because Ben's article's are member supported. He goes on to show graphic images and to talk about Winston Shrout being a political prisoner, that Winston is innocent of any crimes being claimed against him. We all stand at the thresholds of everyone that has discovered the truth about the foreign corporations calling themselves our governments. i.e. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE STATE OF.. such as THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. They are all frauds and pirates and are the very one's committing the crimes against us. Fraud vitiates all! Everyone of these patriots have put themselves at risk to bring us the truth. The first to expose the truth and do something about it is ICELAND. They took back their government and jailed all the bankers. If you are unaware of the truth of these matters it would be to your benefit to research and study. Many Blessings. Nikki G.


Two Maxims of Law
• A piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their ownership.
• A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.


Once Ben's full article becomes public I will post it.
The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 5:22:00 PM


Tuesday, November 20, 2018
Jerry Brown Might Be in BIG TROUBLE Over Wildfires; Here’s Why…


This report doesn't even begin to cover the crimes of Jerry Brown and Kamala Harris who embezzled 19 billion from California homeowners and now this tragic loss of life and property? There are over 63000 sealed indictments of which over 10,000 are for California adding to that each indictment will list more than one person meaning we are looking at that number rising well over 15,000. I have no doubt that Jerry Brown and Kamala Harris are among those indicted!!!!! Nikki G.


The Next News Network
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 9:11:00 PM
Thursday, October 25, 2018
Are all the councils protecting pedophiles?
Note: he talks about colloidal silver saying to get .999 calling it pure: IT IS NOT PURE you must be sure to use .9999 silver. Only .9999 is pure i.e. Canadian Maple Leaf Silver Dollar coin. I will be adding my article on how to make your own colloidal silver soon. Nikki G.


Posted by Soaring Spirit at 3:36:00 PM


Wednesday, October 24, 2018
The Unanimous Declaration: The Declaration of Independence


For those of you that have never read the declaration of independence, you will find it interesting that pretty much the grievances of the people then are the same as ours today. Read on and see for your self. Those who ignore history are bound to continually repeat it! Nikki G.


shared by: Arnie Rosner: ScannedRetina
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776.
THE UNANIMOUS
DECLARATION
OF THE
THIRTEEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
WHEN, in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s GOD entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the Causes which impel them to the Separation.
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their CREATOR, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate, that Governments long established, should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The History of the present King of Great-Britain is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid World.
HE has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public Good.
HE has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing Importance, unless suspended in their Operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
HE has refused to pass other Laws for the Accommodation of large Districts of People, unless those People would relinquish the Right of Representation in the Legislature, a Right inestimable to them, and formidable to Tyranny only.
HE has called together Legislative Bodies at Places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the Depository of their public Records, for the sole Purpose of fatiguing them into Compliance with his Measures.
HE has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly Firmness his Invasions on the Rights of the People.
HE has refused for a long Time, after such Dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining, in the mean Time, exposed to all the Dangers of Invasion from without, and Convulsions within.
HE has endeavoured to prevent the Population of these States; for that Purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their Migrations hither, and raising the Conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
HE has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
HE has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the Tenure of their Offices, and the Amount and Payment of their Salaries.
HE has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harrass our People, and eat out their Substance.
HE has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the Consent of our Legislatures.
HE has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
HE has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
FOR quartering large Bodies of Armed Troops among us:
FOR protecting them, by a mock Trial, from Punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
FOR cutting off our Trade with all Parts of the World:
FOR imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
FOR depriving us, in many Cases, of the Benefits of Trial by Jury:
FOR transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offences:
FOR abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an arbitrary Government, and enlarging its Boundaries, so as to render it at once an Example and fit Instrument for introducing the same absolute Rule into these Colonies:
FOR taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
FOR suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with Power to legislate for us in all Cases whatsoever.
HE has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection, and waging War against us.
HE has plundered our Seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our Towns, and destroyed the Lives of our People.
HE is, at this Time, transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the Works of Death, Desolation, and Tyranny, already begun with Circumstances of Cruelty and Perfidy, scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous Ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized Nation.
HE has constrained our Fellow-Citizens, taken Captive on the high Seas, to bear Arms against their Country, to become the Executioners of their Friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
HE has excited domestic Insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the Inhabitants of our Frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes, and Conditions.
IN every Stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. A Prince, whose Character is thus marked by every Act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the Ruler of a free People.
NOR have we been wanting in Attentions to our British Brethren. We have warned them, from Time to Time, of Attempts by their Legislature to extend an unwarrantable Jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the Circumstances of our Emigration and Settlement here. We have appealed to their native Justice and Magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the Ties of our common Kindred to disavow these Usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our Connexions and Correspondence. They too have been deaf to the Voice of Justice and of Consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the Necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the Rest of Mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
WE, therefore, the Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in GENERAL CONGRESS Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the Rectitude of our Intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly Publish and Declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political Connexion between them and the State of Great-Britain, is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which INDEPENDENT STATES may of Right do. And for the Support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of DIVINE PROVIDENCE, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honour.
John Hancock.
GEORGIA, Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, Geo. Walton.
NORTH-CAROLINA, Wm. Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn.
SOUTH-CAROLINA, Edward Rutledge, Thos Heyward, junr. Thomas Lynch, junr. Arthur Middleton.
MARYLAND, Samuel Chase, Wm. Paca, Thos. Stone, Charles Carroll, of Carrollton.
VIRGINIA, George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Ths. Jefferson, Benja. Harrison, Thos. Nelson, jr. Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton.
PENNSYLVANIA, Robt. Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benja. Franklin, John Morton, Geo. Clymer, Jas. Smith, Geo. Taylor, James Wilson, Geo. Ross.
DELAWARE, Caesar Rodney, Geo. Read.
NEW-YORK, Wm. Floyd, Phil. Livingston, Frank Lewis, Lewis Morris.
NEW-JERSEY, Richd. Stockton, Jno. Witherspoon, Fras. Hopkinson, John Hart, Abra. Clark.
NEW-HAMPSHIRE, Josiah Bartlett, Wm. Whipple, Matthew Thornton.
MASSACHUSETTS-BAY, Saml. Adams, John Adams, Robt. Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry.
RHODE-ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE, &c. Step. Hopkins, William Ellery.
CONNECTICUT, Roger Sherman, Saml. Huntington, Wm. Williams, Oliver Wolcott.
IN CONGRESS, JANUARY 18, 1777.
ORDERED,
THAT an authenticated Copy of the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCY, with the Names of the MEMBERS of CONGRESS, subscribing the same, be sent to each of the UNITED STATES, and that they be desired to have the same put on RECORD.
By Order of CONGRESS,
JOHN HANCOCK, President.
BALTIMORE, in MARYLAND: Printed by MARY KATHARINE GODDARD.


de jure American Government – A return to the founding principles
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 8:09:00 PM


Saturday, October 20, 2018
A mysterious, paralyzing disease hits the US By Strange Sounds


shared by https://oom2.com 


The CDC warns against a new illness that can cause paralysis in children, BUT A DISEASE WITH NO KNOWN CAUSE?

A mysterious polio-like illness is on the rise in the U.S., mainly impacting young children. By Joe Raedle/Getty Images
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is warning against a mysterious new illness that’s appeared in children in 22 states this year and is quickly spreading across the US. [Vox]
So far, the CDC has received 127 reports of suspected cases of the disease, which is called acute flaccid myelitis. AFM is a polio-like condition that affects the nervous system and may cause paralysis. [Twitter]
Ninety percent of the afflicted patients are under the age of 18. The cause of AFM is still unknown, as patients have not tested positive for polio, but doctors suspect it’s a virus. Though there’s no vaccine to treat it so far, most children recover quickly. [ABC News]


AFM first grabbed attention in 2014 with 120 reported cases. Yet the condition indicates an every-other-year pattern, with the number of afflicted patients dropping every year and spiking the following one. [NBCNews]


https://youtu.be/c7OZMgmnW9c 


The 2014 increase coincided with a national outbreak of a severe respiratory illness caused by another non-polio virus, the enterovirus D68. People are more likely to get infected by D68 during the fall. [CNN]
Minnesota, which previously saw only one case of AFM a year, now has seven confirmed cases of the virus, according to state officials. [KNSI]
We are creating some weird superbugs that are going to kill all of us (or let’s stay positive… almost all of us)!
Thanks to: https://strangesounds.org 


[Note: If you are unfamiliar with natural alternatives i.e. Colloidal Silver and natural anti-biotic herbs go to my website: http:soaringspirit.us  click on my articles here I show you how to make your own anti-biotic's which you will have on hand whenever you need them. Many Blessings. Nikki G.]
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 2:42:00 AM


Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Dear Federal Government, PLEASE PROSECUTE ME. The Federal Zone! NEED TO KNOW!


Dear Federal Government,


PLEASE PROSECUTE ME.


I, Larken Rose, have not filed a federal income tax return for 1997 or any
subsequent year. This is not because I am protesting any law, or because I
do not want to pay my "fair share"; it is because I refuse to be a victim of
the biggest financial fraud in history. I also refuse to remain silent
while government lawyers illegally defraud my fellow Americans.


People by the thousands are learning that the "conventional wisdom" about
the federal income tax is just plain wrong. As more and more Americans are
discovering that the law itself shows that the income of most Americans is
not taxable, DOJ and IRS officials are desperately trying to distract from
the issue by dishonestly portraying it as a frivolous "tax protestor"
argument, and by trying to silence (via court injunctions) those who
publicize the issue. This summary shows why the IRS and the DOJ refuse to
have an open, honest discussion about what the government's own regulations
say:


Point 1: The federal income tax applies only to one's "taxable income," not
to all income, and the income tax regulations (e.g. 26 CFR §§ 1.861-1(a)(1),
1.861-8(a)(1), 1.863-1(c)) clearly show that one's taxable domestic income
is to be determined under the rules of 26 USC § 861(b) and the related
regulations beginning at 26 CFR § 1.861-8. (Other sections explain when
income from outside of the U.S. is taxable.)


Point 2: So why does it matter whether we use those sections to determine
our taxable domestic income? Because more than 80 years of statutory and
regulatory history prove beyond any doubt that 26 USC § 861(b) and 26 CFR §
1.861-8 show income to be taxable only when it comes from certain types of
international or foreign commerce. In other words, contrary to what
"everyone knows," most Americans do not receive taxable income, and do not
owe federal income taxes.


Read the full article here: https://www.apfn.org/APFN/fedzone.htm


Also 31 Questions and Answers on the IRS: http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm


You need to know that due to the fact that ALL entities calling themselves government or government services, i.e. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF [insert your state here] are all corporations and thereby function as commercial transactions. Due to this fact they are ALL liable to not only the laws and constitutions of this country but to the INTERNATIONAL COVENANTS. You can read the International Covenants here: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1976/03/19760323%2006-17%20AM/Ch_IV_04.pdf 



[Note: I think it is important here for all of us to comprehend that Donald J. Trump was elected by the people for the Presidency of "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". But what most may not realize is "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA", is actually a foreign for profit corporation. Here is Title 28 U.S. Code 3002:
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States””
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002  


So Donald J. Trump is the COO of this foreign corporation, and he is keeping his promises by cleaning the swamp of that foreign for profit corporation and we can only hope to see it wiped completely clean so we can restore what this countries founders intended, which is our Republican form of governance. The same applies to all our states. You see all: "STATE OF", i.e. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, etc., are also ALL corporations and need all of us to wake up, comprehend the truth and take back our sovereignty, as Trump has stated repeatedly and re-claim our Republican form of governance over our nation states.


One way of doing this is to join our National Assemblies by going to: https://national-assembly.net find your state and become a member. Nikki G.]


Two Maxims of Law
• A piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their ownership.
• A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 3:53:00 PM


Tuesday, January 15, 2019
[TOPIC] Trump's Remarks Farm Bureau Federation's 100th Annual Convention - Fulford Report 1/14/19 - Anon commentary - Political Commentaries - Healing and more with Plasma, Vaccines are toxic, and more 1/14/19


"RISE & RISE AGAIN, UNTIL LAMBS BECOME LIONS"
Watch Free: Robin Hood 2010


Trump's Remarks Farm Bureau Federation's 100th Annual Convention


Read more »
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 3:44:00 PM


Tuesday, February 5, 2019
Why the Foreign Owned & Foreign Domiciled IRS Has Been Stealing From You & Has No Grounds For It - 31 Questions and Answers about the Internal Revenue Service - Reposted by Sun Tzu  [Why would Jeff Dougherty make such evil claims about me and yet repost my work?] 


The Next News Network



31 Questions and Answers about
the Internal Revenue Service


Revision 3.9


certified by


Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of Washington State, Federal Witness,
Private Attorney General, Author and
Webmaster of the Supreme Law Library


Internet URL of home page:
http://www.supremelaw.org/


Internet URL of this file:
 http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm


Common Law Copyright
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice



1. Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury?


Answer: No. The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury. The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviated “31 U.S.C.” The only mention of the IRS anywhere in 31 U.S.C. §§ 301 315 is an authorization for the President to appoint an Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS. See 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).


At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D. The Guarantee,Clause in,the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats). See Article IV, Section 4. Since there was no organic Act creating it, IRS is not a lawful organization.



2. If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?


Answer: The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”). But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed.



In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit identified a second “Secretary of the Treasury” as a man by the name of Manual Díaz-Saldaña. See the definitions of “Secretary” and “Secretary or his delegate” at 27 CFR 26.11 (formerly 27 CFR 250.11), and the published decision in Used Tire International, Inc. v. Manual Díaz-Saldaña, court docket number 97 2348, September 11, 1998. Both definitions mention Puerto Rico.


When all the evidence is examined objectively, IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. (“RICO”). Think of Puerto RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act); in other words, it is an organized crime syndicate operating under false and fraudulent pretenses. See also the Sherman Act and the Lanham Act.



3. By what legal authority, if any, has the IRS established offices inside the 50 States of the Union?


Answer: After much diligent research, several investigators have concluded that there is no known Act of Congress, nor any Executive Order, giving IRS lawful jurisdiction to operate within any of the 50 States of the Union.


Their presence within the 50 States appears to stem from certain Agreements on Coordination of Tax Administration (“ACTA”), which officials in those States have consummated with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. A template for ACTA agreements can be found at the IRS Internet website and in the Supreme Law Library on the Internet.


However, those ACTA agreements are demonstrably fraudulent, for example, by expressly defining “IRS” as a lawful bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. (See Answer to Question 1 above.) Moreover, those ACTA agreements also appear to violate State laws requiring competitive bidding before such a service contract can be awarded by a State government to any subcontractor. There is no evidence to indicate that ACTA agreements were reached after competitive bidding processes; on the contrary, the IRS is adamant about maintaining a monopoly syndicate.



4. Can IRS legally show “Department of the Treasury” on their outgoing mail?


Answer: No. It is obvious that such deceptive nomenclature is intended to convey the false impression that IRS is a lawful bureau or department within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal laws prohibit the use of United States Mail for fraudulent purposes. Every piece of U.S. Mail sent from IRS with “Department of the Treasury” in the return address, is one count of mail fraud. See also 31 U.S.C. 333.



5. Does the U.S. Department of Justice have power of attorney to represent the IRS in federal court?


Answer: No. Although the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) does have power of attorney to represent federal agencies before federal courts, the IRS is not an “agency” as that term is legally defined in the Freedom of Information Act or in the Administrative Procedures Act. The governments of all federal Territories are expressly excluded from the definition of federal “agency” by Act of Congress. See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C).


Since IRS is domiciled in Puerto Rico (RICO?), it is thereby excluded from the definition of federal agencies which can be represented by the DOJ. The IRS Chief Counsel, appointed by the President under authority of 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2), can appear, or appoint a delegate to appear in federal court on behalf of IRS and IRS employees. Again, see the Answer to Question 1 above. As far as powers of attorney are concerned, the chain of command begins with Congress, flows to the President, and then to the IRS Chief Counsel, and NOT to the U.S. Department of Justice.



6. Were the so-called 14th and 16th amendments properly ratified?


Answer: No. Neither was properly ratified. In the case of People v. Boxer (December 1992), docket number #S-030016, U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer fell totally silent in the face of an Application to the California Supreme Court by the People of California, for an ORDER compelling Senator Boxer to witness the material evidence against the so-called 16th amendment.


That so called “amendment” allegedly authorized federal income taxation, even though it contains no provision expressly repealing two Constitutional Clauses mandating that direct taxes must be apportioned. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court have both ruled that repeals by implication are not favored. See Crawford Fitting Co. et al. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 442 (1987).


The material evidence in question was summarized in AFFIDAVITs that were properly executed and filed in that case. Boxer fell totally silent, thus rendering those affidavits the “truth of the case.” The so called 16th amendment has now been correctly identified as a major fraud upon the American People and the United States. Major fraud against the United States is a serious federal offense. See 18 U.S.C. 1031.


Similarly, the so-called 14th amendment was never properly ratified either. In the case of Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d 266, 270 (1968), the Utah Supreme Court recited numerous historical facts proving, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the so called 14th amendment was likewise a major fraud upon the American People.



Those facts, in many cases, were Acts of the several State Legislatures voting for or against that proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Law Library has a collection of references detailing this major fraud.


The U.S. Constitution requires that constitutional amendments be ratified by three-fourths of the several States. As such, their Acts are governed by the Full Faith and Credit Clause in the U.S. Constitution. See Article IV, Section 1.


Judging by the sheer amount of litigation its various sections have generated, particularly Section 1, the so called 14th amendment is one of the worst pieces of legislation ever written in American history. The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” is properly understood to mean “subject to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress.” (See Answer to Question 19 below.)


For this one reason alone, the Congressional Resolution proposing the so-called 14th amendment is provably vague and therefore unconstitutional. See 14 Stat. 358-359, Joint Resolution No. 48, June 16, 1866.



7. Where are the statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes?


Answer: Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) contains no provisions creating a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A. Aside from the statutes which apply only to federal government employees, pursuant to the Public Salary Tax Act, the only other statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes are those itemized in the definition of “Withholding agent” at IRC section 7701(a)(16). For example, see IRC section 1461. A separate liability statute for “employment” taxes imposed by subtitle C is found at IRC section 3403.


After a worker authorizes a payroll officer to withhold taxes, typically by completing Form W 4, the payroll officer then becomes a withholding agent who is legally and specifically liable for payment of all taxes withheld from that worker’s paycheck. Until such time as those taxes are paid in full into the Treasury of the United States, the withholding agent is the only party who is legally liable for those taxes, not the worker. See IRC section 7809 (“Treasury of the United States”).


If the worker opts instead to complete a Withholding Exemption Certificate, consistent with IRC section 3402(n), the payroll officer is not thereby authorized to withhold any federal income taxes. In this latter situation, there is absolutely no liability for the worker or for the payroll officer; in other words, there is no liability PERIOD, specifically because there is no withholding agent.



8. Can a federal regulation create a specific liability, when no specific liability is created by the corresponding statute?


Answer: No. The U.S. Constitution vests all legislative power in the Congress of the United States. See Article I, Section 1. The Executive Branch of the federal government has no legislative power whatsoever. This means that agencies of the Executive Branch, and also the federal Courts in the Judicial Branch, are prohibited from making law.


If an Act of Congress fails to create a specific liability for any tax imposed by that Act, then there is no liability for that tax. Executive agencies have no authority to cure any such omission by using regulations to create a liability.


“[A]n administrative agency may not create a criminal offense or any liability not sanctioned by the lawmaking authority, especially a liability for a tax or inspection fee.” See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 4 L.Ed.2d 127, 80 S.Ct. 144 (1959), and Independent Petroleum Corp. v. Fly, 141 F.2d 189 (5th Cir. 1944) as cited at 2 Am Jur 2d, p. 129, footnote 2 (1962 edition) [bold emphasis added]. However, this cite from American Jurisprudence has been removed from the 1994 edition of that legal encyclopedia.



9. The federal regulations create an income tax liability for what specific classes of people?


Answer: The regulations at 26 CFR 1.1-1 attempted to create a specific liability for all “citizens of the United States” and all “residents of the United States”. However, those regulations correspond to IRC section 1, which does not create a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A.


Therefore, these regulations are an overly broad extension of the underlying statutory authority; as such, they are unconstitutional, null and void ab initio (from the beginning, in Latin). The Acker case cited above held that federal regulations can not exceed the underlying statutory authority. (See Answer to Question 8 above.)



10. How many classes of citizens are there, and how did this number come to be?


Answer: There are two (2) classes of citizens: State Citizens and federal citizens. The first class originates in the Qualifications Clauses in the U.S. Constitution, where the term “Citizen of the United States” is used. (See 1:2:2, 1:3:3 and 2:1:5.) Notice the UPPER-CASE “C” in “Citizen”.


The pertinent court cases have defined the term “United States” in these Clauses to mean “States United”, and the full term means “Citizen of ONE OF the States United”. See People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870); Judge Pablo De La Guerra signed the California Constitution of 1849, when California first joined the Union. Similar terms are found in the Diversity Clause at Article III, Section 2, Clause 1, and in the Privileges and Immunities Clause at Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1. Prior to the Civil War, there was only one (1) class of Citizens under American Law. See the holding in Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914 915 (1918), for definitive authority on this key point.


The second class originates in the 1866 Civil Rights Act, where the term “citizen of the United States” is used. This Act was later codified at 42 U.S.C. 1983. Notice the lower-case “c” in “citizen”. The pertinent court cases have held that Congress thereby created a municipal franchise primarily for members of the Negro race, who were freed by President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation (a war measure), and later by the Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery and involuntary servitude. Compelling payment of a “tax” for which there is no liability statute is tantamount to involuntary servitude, and extortion.


Instead of using the unique term “federal citizen”, as found in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, it is now clear that the Radical Republicans who sponsored the 1866 Civil Rights Act were attempting to confuse these two classes of citizens. Then, they attempted to elevate this second class to constitutional status, by proposing a 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. As we now know, that proposal was never ratified. (See Answer to Question 6 above.)


Numerous court cases have struggled to clarify the important differences between the two classes. One of the most definitive, and dispositive cases, is Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914 915 (1918), which clearly held that federal citizens had no standing to sue under the Diversity Clause, because they were not even contemplated when Article III in the U.S. Constitution was first being drafted, circa 1787 A.D.


Another is Ex parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855) in which the California Supreme Court ruled that there was no such thing as a “citizen of the United States” (as of the year 1855 A.D.). Only federal citizens have standing to invoke 42 U.S.C. 1983; whereas State Citizens do not. See Wadleigh v. Newhall, 136 F. 941 (C.C. Cal. 1905).


Many more cases can be cited to confirm the existence of two classes of citizens under American Law. These cases are thoroughly documented in the book entitled “The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue” by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., now in its eleventh edition. See also the pleadings in the case of USA v. Gilbertson, also in the Supreme Law Library. 


11. Can one be a State Citizen, without also being a federal citizen?


Answer: Yes. The 1866 Civil Rights Act was municipal law, confined to the District of Columbia and other limited areas where Congress is the “state” government with exclusive legislative jurisdiction there. These areas are now identified as “the federal zone.” (Think of it as the blue field on the American flag; the stars on the flag are the 50 States.) As such, the 1866 Civil Rights Act had no effect whatsoever upon the lawful status of State Citizens, then or now.


Several courts have already recognized our Right to be State Citizens without also becoming federal citizens. For excellent examples, see State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380, 6 S. 602 (1889) and Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155, 48 S. 788, 791 (1909). The Maine Supreme Court also clarified the issue by explaining our “Right of Election” or “freedom of choice,” namely, our freedom to choose between two different forms of government. See 44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting.


Since the Guarantee Clause does not require the federal government to guarantee a Republican Form of Government to the federal zone, Congress is free to create a different form of government there, and so it has. In his dissenting opinion in Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 at 380 (1901), Supreme Court Justice Harlan called it an absolute legislative democracy.


But, State Citizens are under no legal obligation to join or pledge any allegiance to that legislative democracy; their allegiance is to one or more of the several States of the Union (i.e. the white stars on the American flag, not the blue field).


12. Who was Frank Brushaber, and why was his U.S. Supreme Court case so important?


Answer: Frank Brushaber was the Plaintiff in the case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), the first U.S. Supreme Court case to consider the so called 16th amendment. Brushaber identified himself as a Citizen of New York State and a resident of the Borough of Brooklyn, in the city of New York, and nobody challenged that claim.


The Union Pacific Railroad Company was a federal corporation created by Act of Congress to build a railroad through Utah (from the Union to the Pacific), at a time when Utah was a federal Territory, i.e. inside the federal zone.


Brushaber’s attorney committed an error by arguing that the company had been chartered by the State of Utah, but Utah was not a State of the Union when Congress first created that corporation.


Brushaber had purchased stock issued by the company. He then sued the company to recover taxes that Congress had imposed upon the dividends paid to its stockholders. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Frank Brushaber, and upheld the tax as a lawful excise, or indirect tax.


The most interesting result of the Court’s ruling was a Treasury Decision (“T.D.”) that the U.S. Department of the Treasury later issued as a direct consequence of the high Court’s opinion. In T.D. 2313, the U.S. Treasury Department expressly cited the Brushaber decision, and it identified Frank Brushaber as a “nonresident alien” and the Union Pacific Railroad Company as a “domestic corporation”. This Treasury Decision has never been modified or repealed.


T.D. 2313 is crucial evidence proving that the income tax provisions of the IRC are municipal law, with no territorial jurisdiction inside the 50 States of the Union. The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury who approved T.D. 2313 had no authority to extend the holding in the Brushaber case to anyone or anything not a proper Party to that court action.


Thus, there is no escaping the conclusion that Frank Brushaber was the nonresident alien to which that Treasury Decision refers. Accordingly, all State Citizens are nonresident aliens with respect to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress, i.e. the federal zone.


13. What is a “Withholding agent”?


Answer: (See Answer to Question 7 first.) The term “Withholding agent” is legally defined at IRC section 7701(a)(16). It is further defined by the statutes itemized in that section, e.g. IRC 1461 where liability for funds withheld is clearly assigned. In plain English, a “withholding agent” is a person who is responsible for withholding taxes from a worker’s paycheck, and then paying those taxes into the Treasury of the United States, typically on a quarterly basis. See IRC section 7809.


One cannot become a withholding agent unless workers first authorize taxes to be withheld from their paychecks. This authorization is typically done when workers opt to execute a valid W 4 “Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate.” In plain English, by signing a W 4 workers designate themselves as “employees” and certify they are allowing withholding to occur.


If workers do not execute a valid W 4 form, a company’s payroll officer is not authorized to withhold any federal income taxes from their paychecks. In other words, the payroll officer does not have “permission” or “power of attorney” to withhold taxes, until and unless workers authorize or “allow” that withholding by signing Form W 4 knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily.


Pay particular attention to the term “Employee” in the title of this form. A properly executed Form W 4 creates the presumption that the workers wish to be treated as if they were “employees” of the federal government. Obviously, for people who do not work for the federal government, such a presumption is a legal fiction, at best.


14. What is a “Withholding Exemption Certificate”?


Answer: A “Withholding Exemption Certificate” is an alternative to Form W 4, authorized by IRC section 3402(n) and executed in lieu of Form W 4. Although section 3402(n) does authorize this Certificate, the IRS has never added a corresponding form to its forms catalog (see the IRS “Printed Products Catalog”).


In the absence of an official IRS form, workers can use the language of section 3402(n) to create their own Certificates. In simple language, the worker certifies that s/he had no federal income tax liability last year, and anticipates no federal income tax liability during the current calendar year. Because there are no liability statutes for workers in the private sector, this certification is easy to justify.


Many public and private institutions have created their own form for the Withholding Exemption Certificate, e.g. California Franchise Tax Board, and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. This fact can be confirmed by using any search engine, e.g. google.com, to locate occurrences of the term “withholding exemption certificate” on the Internet. This term occurs several times in IRC section 3402.


15. What is “tax evasion” and who might be guilty of this crime?


Answer: “Tax evasion” is the crime of evading a lawful tax. In the context of federal income taxes, this crime can only be committed by persons who have a legal liability to pay, i.e. the withholding agent. If one is not employed by the federal government, one is not subject to the Public Salary Tax Act unless one chooses to be treated “as if” one is a federal government “employee.” This is typically done by executing a valid Form W 4.


However, as discussed above, Form W 4 is not mandatory for workers who are not “employed” by the federal government. Corporations chartered by the 50 States of the Union are technically “foreign” corporations with respect to the IRC; they are decidedly not the federal government, and should not be regarded “as if” they are the federal government, particularly when they were never created by any Act of Congress.


Moreover, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that Congress can only create a corporation in its capacity as the Legislature for the federal zone. Such corporations are the only “domestic” corporations under the pertinent federal laws. This writer’s essay entitled “A Cogent Summary of Federal Jurisdictions” clarifies this important distinction between “foreign” and “domestic” corporations in simple, straightforward language.


If Congress were authorized to create national corporations, such a questionable authority would invade States’ rights reserved to them by the Tenth Amendment, namely, the right to charter their own domestic corporations. The repeal of Prohibition left the Tenth Amendment unqualified. See the Constantine case supra.


For purposes of the IRC, the term “employer” refers only to federal government agencies, and an “employee” is a person who works for such an “employer”.


16. Why does IRS Form 1040 not require a Notary Public to notarize a taxpayer’s signature?


Answer: This question is one of the fastest ways to unravel the fraudulent nature of federal income taxes. At 28 U.S.C. section 1746, Congress authorized written verifications to be executed under penalty of perjury without the need for a Notary Public, i.e. to witness one’s signature.


This statute identifies two different formats for such written verifications: (1) those executed outside the “United States” and (2) those executed inside the “United States”. These two formats correspond to sections 1746(1) and 1746(2), respectively.


What is extremely revealing in this statute is the format for verifications executed “outside the United States”. In this latter format, the statute adds the qualifying phrase “under the laws of the United States of America”.


Clearly, the terms “United States” and “United States of America” are both used in this same statute. They are not one and the same. The former refers to the federal government -- in the U.S. Constitution and throughout most federal statutes. The latter refers to the 50 States that are united by, and under, the U.S. Constitution. 28 U.S.C. 1746 is the only federal statute in all of Title 28 of the United States Code that utilizes the term “United States of America”, as such.


It is painfully if not immediately obvious, then, that verifications made under penalty of perjury are outside the “United States” (read “the federal zone”) if and when they are executed inside the 50 States of the Union (read “the State zone”).


Likewise, verifications made under penalty of perjury are outside the 50 States of the Union, if and when they are executed inside the “United States”.


The format for signatures on Form 1040 is the one for verifications made inside the United States (federal zone) and outside the United States of America (State zone).


17. Does the term “United States” have multiple legal meanings and, if so, what are they?


Answer: Yes. The term has several meanings. The term "United States" may be used in any one of several senses. [1] It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. [2] It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or [3] it may be the collective name of the States which are united by and under the Constitution. See Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945) [bold emphasis, brackets and numbers added for clarity].


This is the very same definition that is found in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition. The second of these three meanings refers to the federal zone and to Congress only when it is legislating in its municipal capacity. For example, Congress is legislating in its municipal capacity whenever it creates a federal corporation, like the United States Postal Service.


It is terribly revealing of the manifold frauds discussed in these Answers, that the definition of “United States” has now been removed from the Seventh Edition of Black’s Law Dictionary.


18. Is the term “income” defined in the IRC and, if not, where is it defined?


Answer: The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has already ruled that the term “income” is not defined anywhere in the IRC: “The general term ‘income’ is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code.” U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2d 400, 404 (8th Circuit, 1976).


Moreover, in Mark Eisner v. Myrtle H. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the high Court told Congress it could not legislate any definition of “income” because that term was believed to be in the U.S. Constitution. The Eisner case was predicated on the ratification of the 16thamendment, which would have introduced the term “income” into the U.S. Constitution for the very first time (but only if that amendment had been properly ratified).


In Merchant's Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509 (1921), the high Court defined “income” to mean the profit or gain derived from corporate activities. In that instance, the tax is a lawful excise tax imposed upon the corporate privilege of limited liability, i.e. the liabilities of a corporation do not reach its officers, employees, directors or stockholders.


19. What is municipal law, and are the IRC’s income tax provisions municipal law, or not?


Answer: Yes. The IRC’s income tax provisions are municipal law. Municipal law is law that is enacted to govern the internal affairs of a sovereign State; in legal circles, it is also known as Private International Law. Under American Law, it has a much wider meaning than the ordinances enacted by the governing body of a municipality, i.e. city council or county board of supervisors. In fact, American legal encyclopedias define “municipal” to mean “internal”, and for this reason alone, the Internal Revenue Code is really a Municipal Revenue Code.


A mountain of additional evidence has now been assembled and published in the book “The Federal Zone” to prove that the IRC’s income tax provisions are municipal law.


One of the most famous pieces of evidence is a letter from a Connecticut Congresswoman, summarizing the advice of legal experts employed by the Congressional Research Service and the Legislative Counsel. Their advice confirmed that the meaning of “State” at IRC section 3121(e) is restricted to the named territories and possessions of D.C., Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and Puerto Rico.


In other words, the term “State” in that statute, and in all similar federal statutes, includes ONLY the places expressly named, and no more.


20. What does it mean if my State is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes?


The general rule is that federal government powers must be expressed and enumerated. For example, the U.S. Constitution is a grant of enumerated powers. If a power is not enumerated in the U.S. Constitution, then Congress does not have any authority to exercise that power. This rule is tersely expressed in the Ninth Amendment, in the Bill of Rights.


If California is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes, then those statutes have no force or effect within that State. This is also true of all 50 States.


Strictly speaking, the omission or exclusion of anyone or any thing from a federal statute can be used to infer that the omission or exclusion was intentional by Congress. In Latin, this is tersely stated as follows: Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. In English, this phrase is literally translated: Inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of all other things [that are not mentioned]. This phrase can be found in any edition of Black’s Law Dictionary; it is a maxim of statutory construction.


The many different definitions of the term “State” that are found in federal laws are intentionally written to appear as if they include the 50 States PLUS the other places mentioned. As the legal experts in Congress have now confirmed, this is NOT the correct way to interpret, or to construct, these statutes.


If a place is not mentioned, every American may correctly infer that the omission of that place from a federal statute was an intentional act of Congress. Whenever it wants to do so, Congress knows how to define the term “United States” to mean the 50 States of the Union. See IRC section 4612(a)(4)(A).


21. In what other ways is the IRC deliberately vague, and what are the real implications for the average American?


There are numerous other ways in which the IRC is deliberately vague. The absence of any legal definition for the term “income” is a classic deception. The IRS enforces the Code as a tax on everything that “comes in,” but nothing could be further from the truth. “Income” is decidedly NOT everything that “comes in.”


More importantly, the fact that this vagueness is deliberate is sufficient grounds for concluding that the entire Code is null, void and unconstitutional, for violating our fundamental Right to know the nature and cause of any accusation, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment in the Bill of Rights.


Whether the vagueness is deliberate or not, any statute is unconstitutionally void if it is vague. If a statute is void for vagueness, the situation is the same as if it had never been enacted at all, and for this reason it can be ignored entirely.


22. Has Title 26 of the United States Code (“U.S.C.”) ever been enacted into positive law, and what are the legal implications if Title 26 has notbeen enacted into positive law?


Answer: No. Another, less obvious case of deliberate deception is the statute at IRC section 7851(a)(6)(A), where it states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment of “this title”. Because the term “this title” is not defined anywhere in 26 U.S.C., least of all in the section dedicated to definitions, one is forced to look elsewhere for its meaning, or to derive its meaning from context.


Throughout Title 28 of the United States Code -- the laws which govern all the federal courts -- the term “this title” clearly refers to Title 28. This fact would tend to support a conclusion that “this title”, as that term is used in the IRC, refers to Title 26 of the United States Code. However, Title 26 has never been enacted into positive law, as such.


Even though all federal judges may know the secret meaning of “this title”, they are men and women of UNcommon intelligence. The U.S. Supreme Court’s test for vagueness is violated whenever men and women of common intelligence must necessarily guess at the meaning and differas to the application of a vague statute. See Connally et al. v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926). Thus, federal judges are applying the wrong test for vagueness.


Accordingly, the provisions of subtitle F have never taken effect. (“F” is for enForcement!) This subtitle contains all of the enforcement statutes of the IRC, e.g. filing requirements, penalties for failure to file and tax evasion, grants of court jurisdiction over liens, levies and seizures, summons enforcement and so on.


In other words, the IRC is a big pile of Code without any teeth; as such, it can impose no legal obligations upon anyone, not even people with dentures!


23. What federal courts are authorized to prosecute income tax crimes?


This question must be addressed in view of the Answer to Question 22 above. Although it may appear that certain statutes in the IRC grant original jurisdiction to federal district courts, to institute prosecutions of income tax crimes, none of the statutes found in subtitle Fhas ever taken effect. For this reason, those statutes do not authorize the federal courts to do anything at all. As always, appearances can be very deceiving. Remember the Wizard of Oz or the mad tea party of Alice in Wonderland?


On the other hand, the federal criminal Code at Title 18, U.S.C., does grant general authority to the District Courts of the United States (“DCUS”) to prosecute violations of the statutes found in that Code. See 18 U.S.C. 3231.


It is very important to appreciate the fact that these courts are not the same as the United States District Courts (“USDC”). The DCUS are constitutional courts that originate in Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The USDC are territorial tribunals, or legislative courts, that originate in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, also known as the Territory Clause.


This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Eighth Circuit on behalf of the Defendant in USA v. Gilbertson cites numerous court cases that have already clarified the all important distinction between these two classes of federal district courts. For example, in Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 at 312 (1922), the high Court held that the USDC belongs in the federal Territories. This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Ninth Circuit in Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al. develops this theme in even greater detail; begin reading at section “7(e)”.


The USDC, as such, appear to lack any lawful authorities to prosecute income tax crimes. The USDC are legislative tribunals where summary proceedings dominate.


For example, under the federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 1292, the U.S. Courts of Appeal have no appellate jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders issued by the USDC. Further details on this point are available in the Press Release entitled “Private Attorney General Cracks Title 28 of the United States Code” and dated November 26, 2001 A.D.


24. Are federal judges required to pay income taxes on their pay, and what are the real implications if they do pay taxes on their pay?


Answer: No. Federal judges who are appointed to preside on the District Courts of the United States –- the Article III constitutionalcourts –- are immune from any taxation of their pay, by constitutional mandate.


The fact that all federal judges are currently paying taxes on their pay is proof of undue influence by the IRS, posing as a duly authorized agency of the Executive Branch. See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920).


Even if the IRS were a lawful bureau or department within the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are NOT), the existence of undue influence by the Executive Branch would violate the fundamental principle of Separation of Powers. This principle, in theory, keeps the 3 branches of the federal government confined to their respective areas, and prevents any one branch from usurping the lawful powers that rightly belong to the other two branches.


The Separation of Powers principle is succinctly defined in Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933); however, in that decision the Supreme Court erred by defining “Party” to mean only Plaintiffs in Article III, contrary to the definition of “Party” that is found in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856).


The federal judiciary, contemplated by the organic U.S. Constitution, was intended to be independent and unbiased. These two qualities are the essence, or sine qua non of judicial power, i.e. without which there is nothing. Undue influence obviously violates these two qualities. See Evans v. Gore supra.


In Lord v. Kelley, 240 F.Supp. 167, 169 (1965), the federal judge in that case was honest enough to admit, in his published opinion, that federal judges routinely rule in favor of the IRS, because they fear the retaliation that might result from ruling against the IRS. There you have it, from the horse’s mouth!


In front of a class of law students at the University of Arizona in January of 1997, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist openly admitted that all federal judges are currently paying taxes on their judicial pay. This writer was an eyewitness to that statement by the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court -– the highest Court in the land.


Thus, all federal judges are now material witnesses to the practice of concealing the Withholding Exemption Certificate from them, when they were first hired as “employees” of the federal judiciary. As material witnesses, they are thereby disqualified from presiding on all federal income tax cases.


25. Can federal grand juries issue valid indictments against illegal tax protesters?


Answer: No. Federal grand juries cannot issue valid indictments against illegal tax protesters. Protest has never been illegal in America, because the First Amendment guarantees our fundamental Right to express our objections to any government actions, in written and in spoken words.


Strictly speaking, the term “illegal” cannot modify the noun “protesters” because to do so would constitute a violation of the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights, one of the most magnificent constitutional provisions ever written.


Accordingly, for the term “illegal tax protester” to survive this obvious constitutional challenge, the term “illegal” must modify the noun “tax”. An illegal tax protester is, therefore, someone who is protesting an illegal tax. Such an act of protest is protected by the First Amendment, and cannot be a crime.


Protest is also recognized and honored by the Uniform Commercial Code; the phrases “under protest” and “without prejudice” are sufficient to reserve all of one’s fundamental Rights at law. See U.C.C. 1-308 (UCCA 1308 in California).


By the way, the federal U.C.C. is also municipal law. See the Answer to Question 19 above, and 77 Stat. 630, P.L. 88 243, December 30, 1963 (one month after President John F. Kennedy was murdered).


26. Do IRS agents ever tamper with federal grand juries, and how is this routinely done?


Answer: Yes. IRS agents routinely tamper with federal grand juries, most often by misrepresenting themselves, under oath, as lawful employees and “Special Agents” of the federal government, and by misrepresenting the provisions of subtitle F as having any legal force or effect. Such false representations of fact violate Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, uncodified at 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). (Title 15 of the United States Code has not been enacted into positive law either.)


They tamper with grand juries by acting as if “income” is everything that “comes in”, when there is no such definition anywhere in the IRC. Such false descriptions of fact also violate Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act.


They tamper with grand juries by presenting documentary evidence which they had no authority to acquire, in the first instance, such as bank records. Bank signature cards do not constitute competent waivers of their customers’ fundamental Rights to privacy, as secured by the Fourth Amendment. The high standard for waivers of fundamental Rights was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).


IRS agents tamper with grand juries by creating and maintaining the false and fraudulent pretenses that the IRC is not vague, or that the income tax provisions have any legal force or effect inside the 50 States of the Union, when those provisions do not.


These are all forms of perjury, as well, and possibly also misprision of perjury by omission, i.e. serious federal offenses.


Finally, there is ample evidence that IRS agents bribe U.S. Attorneys, federal judges, and even the Office of the President with huge kickbacks, every time a criminal indictment is issued by a federal grand jury against an illegal tax protester. (See the Answer to Question 25 above.) These kick backs range from $25,000 to $35,000 in CASH! They also violate the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986, which penalizes the payment of kickbacks from federal government subcontractors. See 41 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.


As a trust domiciled in Puerto Rico, the IRS is, without a doubt, a federal government subcontractor that is subject to this Act. See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62). The systematic and premeditated pattern of racketeering by IRS employees also establishes probable cause to dismantle the IRS permanently for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act, first enacted in the year 1890 A.D. See 26 Stat. 209 (1890) (uncodified at 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)


27. What is “The Kickback Racket,” and where can I find evidence of its existence?


The evidence of this “kickback racket” was first discovered in a table of delegation orders, on a page within the Internal Revenue Manual (“IRM”) -- the internal policy and procedure manual for all IRS employees.


Subsequently, this writer submitted a lawful request, under the Freedom of Information Act, for a certified list of all payments that had ever been made under color of these delegation orders in the IRM. Mr. Mark L. Zolton, a tax law specialist within the Internal Revenue Service, responded on IRS letterhead, transmitted via U.S. Mail, that few records existed for these “awards” because most of them were paid in cash!


When this evidence was properly presented to a federal judge, who had been asked to enforce a federal grand jury subpoena against a small business in Arizona, he ended up obstructing all 28 pieces of U.S. Mail we had transmitted to that grand jury.


Obstruction of correspondence is a serious federal offense, and federal judges have no authority whatsoever to intercept U.S. Mail. See 18 U.S.C. 1702.


Obviously, the federal judge -- John M. Roll -- did NOT want the grand jury in that case to know anything about these kickbacks. They found out anyway, because of the manner in which this writer defended that small business, as its Vice President for Legal Affairs.


28. Can the IRS levy bank accounts without a valid court order?


Answer: No. The Fifth Amendment prohibits all deprivations of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Due Process of Law is another honored and well developed feature of American constitutional practice. Put simply, it requires Notice and Hearing before anyproperty can be seized by any federal government employees, agents, departments or agencies.


A levy against a bank account is a forced seizure of property, i.e. the funds on deposit in that account. No such seizure can occur unless due process of law has first run its course. This means notice, hearing, and deliberate adjudication of all the pertinent issues of law and fact.


Only after this process has run its proper or “due” course, can a valid court order be issued. The holding in U.S. v. O’Dell, 160 F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1947), makes it very clear that the IRS can only levy a bank account after first obtaining a Warrant of Distraint, or court ORDER. And, of course, no court ORDER could ever be obtained unless all affected Parties had first enjoyed their “day in court.”


29. Do federal income tax revenues pay for any government services and, if so, which government services are funded by federal income taxes?


Answer: No. The money trail is very difficult to follow, in this instance, because the IRS is technically a trust with a domicile in Puerto Rico. See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62). As such, their records are protected by laws which guarantee the privacy of trust records within that territorial jurisdiction, provided that the trust is not also violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.


They are technically not an “agency” of the federal government, as that term is defined in the Freedom of Information Act and in the Administrative Procedures Act. The governments of the federal territories are expressly excluded from the definition of “agency” in those Acts of Congress. See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C). (See also the Answer to Question 5 above.)


All evidence indicates that they are a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq.


They appear to be laundering huge sums of money into foreign banks, mostly in Europe, and quite possibly into the Vatican. See the national policy on money laundering at 31 U.S.C. 5341.


The final report of the Grace Commission, convened under President Ronald Reagan, quietly admitted that none of the funds they collect from federal income taxes goes to pay for any federal government services. The Grace Commission found that those funds were being used to pay for interest on the federal debt, and income transfer payments to beneficiaries of entitlement programs like federal pension plans.


30. How can the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) help me to answer other key tax questions?


The availability of correct information about federal government operations is fundamental to maintaining the freedom of the American People. The Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), at 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq., was intended to make government documents available with a minimal amount of effort by the People.


As long as a document is not protected by one of the reasonable exemptions itemized in the FOIA, a requester need only submit a brief letter to the agency having custody of the requested document(s). If the requested document is not produced within 20 working days (excluding weekends and federal holidays), the requester need only prepare a single appeal letter.


If the requested document is not produced within another 20 working days after the date of the appeal letter, the requester is automatically allowed to petition a District Court of the United States (Article III DCUS, not the Article IV USDC) -- to compel production of the requested document, and judicially to enjoin the improper withholding of same. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). The general rule is that statutes conferring original jurisdiction on federal district courts must be strictly construed.


This writer has pioneered the application of the FOIA to request certified copies of statutes and regulations which should exist, but do notexist. A typical request anyone can make, to which the U.S. Treasury has now fallen totally silent, is for a certified copy of all statutes which create a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A of the IRC. For example, see the FOIA request that this writer prepared for author Lynne Meredith.


Of course, by now we already know the answer to this question, before asking it. (Good lawyers always know the answers to their questions, before asking them.)


It should also be clear that such a FOIA request should not be directed to the IRS, because they are not an “agency” as that term is defined at 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C). Address it instead to the Disclosure Officer, Disclosure Services, Room 1054-MT, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington 20220, District of Columbia, USA. This is the format for “foreign” addresses, as explained in USPS Publication #221.


As James Madison once wrote, “A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives."


31. Where can I find more information, and still protect my privacy?


There are many civic organizations throughout America who have dedicated their precious time and energy to acquire and disseminate widely these documented truths about the Internal Revenue Service and the Internal Revenue Code.


The Internet’s World Wide Web (“www”) is perhaps the best single source of information (and disinformation) about the IRS, and the major problems now confirmed in the IRC and in the mountains of related policies, procedures, practices, customs, rules, regulations, forms and schedules.


Learn to become a sophisticated consumer of information, and the knowledge you seek will be yours to keep and share -- with those you love and endeavor to free from this terrible plague that persists in America.


Good luck, and may God bless your earnest endeavors to ensure the blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our Posterity, as stated in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution and in the Declaration of Independence



To order additional certified and embossed copies of this document, please send $30.00 in cash or blank U.S. Postal Money Order to:


Paul A. Mitchell
c/o Lake Union Mail
117 East Louisa Street
Seattle 98102-3203
WASHINGTON STATE, USA


A “blank” U.S. Postal Money Order leaves the “PAY TO” line blank, permitting us to negotiate it freely. You may, of course, complete the other half; this allows you to obtain a photocopy of the cancelled money order from the U.S. Postal Service without the need for a court order.


Also, be sure to request information about our MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION to freeze all IRS assets and to enjoin IRS from depositing any tax collections into any account(s) other than the Treasury of the United States. These MOTIONS were filed in two appeals at the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, using FRAP Rule 8 and the special procedures available to a Private Attorney General under the RICO laws.


Finally, don’t miss this opportunity to request more information about our historic APPLICATION FOR ORDER DISSOLVING THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, under a specific authority granted to the District Courts of the United States (“DCUS”) at 18 U.S.C. 1964(a). Refer to DCUS docket #SA CV 02-0382 GLT(ANx), Santa Ana, California.



VERIFICATION


As the Undersigned, I hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (federal government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). See the Supremacy Clause for Constitutional authority.




Dated: ______________________________________________________




Signed: ______________________________________________________
Printed: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S
Citizen of Washington State, qualified Federal Witness,
Private Attorney General, Author of “The Federal Zone:
Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue” (all editions),
and Webmaster of the Supreme Law Library:


https://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm



Final note's by Nikki G.


Two Maxims of Law
• A piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their ownership.
• A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.


Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.


RIGHTS THAT CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.


We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS


STATUTES ARE NOT LAW – TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE YOU MUST HAVE MY CONSENT.
We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT EVER. We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e. We are living Souls and not a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece of paper or bond paper being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or dead entity.


A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! Flournoy v. First National Bank of Shreveport, 197 LA 1057. 3 So.2d 244, 248.
A “CODE” is NOT a law! In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point of fact in law.
A concurrent or “joint resolution of legislature is NOT “Law”. Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707; Ward v. State, 176 OKL. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110, P.2d 162, 165).
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d, 1344, 1348 (1985).


Supreme Court 1796- This decision has never been overturned:
United States Supreme Court Decision from 1796- [Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] "There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent."
“There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. “Judges” do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have only been Administrators. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions] on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance… [deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);”
“The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” (Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation, not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
“A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not “Law,” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process of law, in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.”
“A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),
A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),”
“A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law).”
The added and revised California constitution use by THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and its agents, are using codes to force extortion levies on all Californians see this link:
https://www.lawnotes.in/California_Revenue_and_Taxation_Code
As stated above all statutes, codes, procedures etc., by any corporations are not the laws of the land and are not enforceable upon the people of this nation. Only We the People have the power to create and enforce law and We the People have not given over our rights or power to foreign agents or entities.
There is no warrant in law for such a holding. Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, at p. 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62 L.Ed. 211. In 51 American Jurisprudence, "Taxation", Sec. 316, "Strict or Liberal Construction", supported by a great wealth of authority, it is said:
'Although it is sometimes broadly stated either that tax laws are to be strictly construed or, on the other hand, that such enactments are to be liberally construed, this apparent conflict of opinion can be reconciled if it is borne in mind that the correct rule appears to be that where the intent of meaning of tax statutes, or statutes levying taxes, is doubtful, they are, unless a contrary legislative intention appears, to be construed most strongly against the government and in favor of the taxpayer or citizen. Any doubts as to their meaning are to be resolved against the taxing authority and in favor of the taxpayer. * * *'
In the 1040 IRS instruction booklet of 1992/1993, page 3, Margaret Richardson wrote a disclaimer stating income taxes are voluntary. We do not nor ever have volunteered to give our wealth away.


WHERE IS YOUR MANDATORY FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938? https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara


Posted by Soaring Spirit at 4:49:00 PM


Sunday, November 18, 2018
Two maxims of Law, plus Supreme court establishes: Statutes, Codes, Procedures, rules etc. are not LAW!


soaringspirit


Two Maxims of Law [Posted by Anna Von Reitz]
• A piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their ownership.
• A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.


Citizenship cannot be forced upon anyone without their consent. Since the living souls in America are not citizens of your foreign corporations and have no voice through the voting franchise in the adoption of the 14th amendment of your private corporate constitution, no consent has been given. Thus, there is no evidence that citizenship was accepted or even wanted by all Americans in this country to the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA corporations. Non-citizens of your foreign corporations are not subject to your domestic laws known as statutes, codes, procedures, etc., civil or criminal, of this country, thus all non-citizens of the foreign corporations calling themselves “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, being in and of themselves de-facto forms of assumed government services and all of its franchises, subsidiaries, agents, including but not limited to: “STATE OF”, departments, courts, etc., no power has been given them by the people for the people that are born on the land and soil of this country known as AMERICA. i.e. no staff of a corporation or subsidiaries’ has any power given to them by We the People to create or enforce laws or any codes, statues procedures, etc., and have not been given to them by the fully informed We the People, and We the People are not subject to the domestic laws known as statutes, codes, etc., thereby we enjoy immunity from all corporations fraudulently calling themselves a government and their agents, and are afforded the same immunity as those of visiting foreign diplomats and their families.
As American Nationals born on the land and soil of America we are not 14th amendment citizen slaves of the foreign for profit private corporations calling themselves “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and “STATE OF CALIFORNIA”. Case in point all corporations and franchises, courts etc. use all upper-case letters in their titles. i.e. All assumed government office’s, courts, departments, agents, actors, principals and departments of their franchises, use an all upper-case word, name and/or title which are dead things, i.e. an all upper-case block work on a piece of paper, etc., such as a birth registration, a bond, a negotiable instrument, licenses, fictitious names, and so on are a fraud and fraud vitiates all.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Fraud 


https://www.youarelaw.org/why-capital-letter-names-matter/ 
It is the locus of the offense which determines jurisdiction, not the offense committed. People v. Godfrey (Cir.1880), 17 Johns, 225, 223 (N.Y. 1819)
Definition: lo·cus (l½“k…s) n., 1. A locality; a place.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8thed., pg. 2287 – “The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant in a legal process prevents the court from acquiring jurisdiction, …”
Gregg’s Manual of English: “A name spelled in all capital letters or a name initialed, is not a proper noun denoting a specific person, but is a fictitious name, or a name of a dead person, or a nom de guerre.”
“Complaint must identify at least one plaintiff by true name; otherwise no action has been commenced.” Roe v New York (1970, SD NY) 49 FRD 279, 14 FR Serv 2d 437, 8 ALR Fed 670.
(The reasoning behind a true name is that neither a State, nor the United States, can pick up a pencil or sneeze, being nothing more than a “piece of paper”. They cannot, therefore, assume the liability of actions nor write a complaint. All activities carried on by governmental agencies are carried out by its agents and actors.)
The Supreme Court case, Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47 (1893) says: Defendant was impleaded by the name of A. W. Becker. Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential. Wilson v. Shannon, 6 Ark. 196; Norris v. Graves, 4 Strob. 32; Seely v. Boon, 1 N. J. Law, 138; Chappell v. Proctor, Harp. 49; Kinnersley v. Knott, 7 C. B. 980; Turner v. Fitt, 3 C. B. 701; Oakley v. Pegler, (Neb .) 46 N. W. Rep. 920; Knox v. Starks, 4 Minn. 20, (Gil. 7 Kenyon v. Semon, (Minn.) 45 N. W. Rep. 10; Beggs v. Wellman, 82 Ala. 391, 2 South. Rep. 877; Nash v. Collier, 5 Dowl. & L. 341; Fewlass v. Abbott, 28 Mich. 270.
The United States Government Printing Office Style Manual clearly defines the rules of grammar for recording of a proper noun in Chapter 3.2, Capitalization. “Proper nouns are capitalized [examples given] Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam family, Italy, and Anglo-Saxon.” It further defines, in Chapter 11.7, that “Names of vessels are quoted in matter printed in other than lower case roman…[examples given are] LUSITANIA [or] Lusitania.”
Black’s Law Dictionary “Fictitious Name“: “A counterfeit, alias, feigned, or pretended name taken by a person, differing in some essential particular from his true name (consisting of Christian name and patronymic), with the implication that it is meant to deceive or mislead.”


Oxford Dictionary:
“nom“: Used in expressions denoting a pseudonym, a false or assumed name.
“Nom de guerre“: War name. A name assumed by or assigned to a person engaged in some action or enterprise.
“Guerre“: War, and as a verb, to wage war.
The U.S. Government Style Manual, Chapter 3 requires only the names of corporate and other fictional entities, or those serving in corporate capacities to be in all capitalized letters. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2008/content-detail.html 
Fictitious names exist for a purpose. Fictions are invented to give court’s jurisdiction. Snider v. Newell 44 SE 354.
See also: https://omnithought.org/why-your-legal-name-written-all-capital-letters/1849 
This nation was not set up as a democracy and was never intended to become one. It was established as a constitutional republic, a constitution is created to limit a governing body, not to enslave the people of a country and the intent was clear that it would remain a limited republic form of governance. All of the Republican form of governments and the offices thereof are still enforceable, but are not being utilized due to the deliberate intent to deceive by “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and “THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA”, by not disclosing the truth of what the federal and state corporations have done to this country and her people. “Fraud vitiates ALL”
When someone has something for which they’ve worked and which they’ve earned, they have an inherent Right to keep it and dispose of it as they may choose. When someone else comes along and just takes it by any means what so ever, that is called theft! When someone else comes along and obtains it by threats, fraud, intimidation, etc., that’s called extortion. And when someone else claiming to be an agent of a government, well the labels don’t change. Here we will add a few more labels such as inland piracy, treason, terrorism, fraud, RICO, securities fraud, etc.
Government is a fiction, it is an artificial mechanism or device created and employed by living souls to facilitate social, commercial intercourse. Government, being a fictional entity, has nothing of its own. That reality must be supplied by real people. When government gives something to someone, it must first take that something from someone else.
color of law https://law.academic.ru/629/color_of_law 
The conduct of a police officer, judge, or another person clothed with governmental authority that, although it superficially appears to be within the individual's lawful power, is actually in contravention of the law. For example, a police officer who makes a false arrest while on duty, or while off duty but when they are wearing a uniform or badge, is acting under color of law. In some circumstances, the phrase also applies to the conduct of private individuals that is specifically authorized or approved by a statute. Depriving a person of his or her federal civil rights under color of law is, in and of itself, a federal crime and a ground for a cause of action. Also called under color of law.
If the conduct violates a federal civil right or criminal law, it is also called state action.
See also color of title.
Color of Law and Legal Definition https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/color-of-law/ 
Color of law refers to an act done under the appearance of legal authorization, when in fact, no such right existed. It applies when a person is acting under real or apparent government authority. The term is used in the federal Civil Rights Act, which gives citizens the right to sue government officials and their agents who use their authority to violate rights guaranteed by federal law.


The following is from the Civil Rights Act:
"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress."
Acting under color of [state] law is misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law Thompson v. Zirkle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77654 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 17, 2007)
McCain minority staff director Henry Kerner to IRS official Lois Lerner and other IRS officials: “the solution is to audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous”


https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-obtains-irs-documents-revealing-mccains-subcommittee-staff-director-urged-irs-to-engage-in-financially-ruinous-targeting/amp/?__twitter_impression=true 



RIGHTS THAT CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.


We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS


STATUTES ARE NOT LAW – TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE YOU MUST HAVE MY CONSENT.
We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT EVER. We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e. We are living Souls and not a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece of paper or bond paper being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or dead entity.


A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! Flournoy v. First National Bank of Shreveport, 197 LA 1057. 3 So.2d 244, 248.
A “CODE” is NOT a law! In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point of fact in law.
A concurrent or “joint resolution of legislature is NOT “Law”. Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707; Ward v. State, 176 OKL. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110, P.2d 162, 165).
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d, 1344, 1348 (1985).


Supreme Court 1796- This decision has never been overturned:
United States Supreme Court Decision from 1796- [Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] "There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent."
“There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. “Judges” do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have only been Administrators. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions] on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance… [deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);”
“The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” (Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation, not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
“A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not “Law,” (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process of law, in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.”
“A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),
A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),”
“A “Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law).”
The added and revised California constitution use by THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and its agents, are using codes to force extortion levies on all Californians see this link:
https://www.lawnotes.in/California_Revenue_and_Taxation_Code  
As stated above all statutes, codes, procedures etc., by any corporations are not the laws of the land and are not enforceable upon the people of this nation. Only We the People have the power to create and enforce law and We the People have not given over our rights or power to foreign agents or entities.
There is no warrant in law for such a holding. Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S. 151, at p. 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62 L.Ed. 211. In 51 American Jurisprudence, "Taxation", Sec. 316, "Strict or Liberal Construction", supported by a great wealth of authority, it is said:
'Although it is sometimes broadly stated either that tax laws are to be strictly construed or, on the other hand, that such enactments are to be liberally construed, this apparent conflict of opinion can be reconciled if it is borne in mind that the correct rule appears to be that where the intent of meaning of tax statutes, or statutes levying taxes, is doubtful, they are, unless a contrary legislative intention appears, to be construed most strongly against the government and in favor of the taxpayer or citizen. Any doubts as to their meaning are to be resolved against the taxing authority and in favor of the taxpayer. * * *'
In the 1040 IRS instruction booklet of 1992/1993, page 3, Margaret Richardson wrote a disclaimer stating income taxes are voluntary. We do not nor ever have volunteered to give our wealth away.
WHERE IS YOUR MANDATORY FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938? https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara 


“THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” is a franchise of the foreign corporation calling its self: “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” both thereby being liable to the international laws. You are all in violation of the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights:
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1976/03/19760323%2006-17%20AM/Ch_IV_04.pdf 
Article 1
1. All peoples have the right of self-determination, "By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 2
1. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its Jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
2. Where not already provided for by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to the rights recognized in the present Covenant.
3. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
Article 5
1. Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
2. There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 7
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
Article 8
1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all their forms shall be prohibited.
2. No one shall be held in servitude.
3. (a) No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour;
Article 9
1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
Article 17
1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.


Proclamation to the people of California. Year: 1849,
https://archive.org/stream/constitutionofst1849cali#page/n7 
We, the people of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings, do establish this Constitution.
Article 1,
sec. 1. All men [living souls] are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protection of property: and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness.
Sec. 2. All political power is inherent in the people, government is instituted for the protection, security and benefit of the people: and they have the right to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.
Sec. 9. Every citizen, [living soul] may freely speak, write and publish his [their] sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain of abridge the liberty of speech or of the press.
Sec. 15. No person shall be imprisoned for debt, in any civil action on mesne or final process, unless in cases of fraud: and no person shall be imprisoned for a militia fine in time of peace.
Sec. 16. No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed.
What is a contract?
A contract is an agreement between two or more persons (e.g., individuals, corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies or government agencies) to do, or to refrain from doing, a particular thing in exchange for something of equal value. No enforceable contract would come into existence if obtained by force, fraud or deception/non-disclosure. The consent or assent of a party to an agreement must be genuine, clearly defined and voluntary. This assent will not be genuine or voluntary in certain cases of duress, mistake, deception or undue pressure. In these cases, any contract real or assumed are null and void, i.e. fraud vitiates all.


You must produce the contract that you are claiming to have made with these living souls, whereby both parties are mutually benefited. No such contract exists.


Sec 17. Foreigners who are, or who may hereafter become bona fide residents of this State, shall enjoy the same rights in respect to the possession, enjoyment and inheritance of property, as native-born citizens. [i.e. wages, income and all other forms of property, are the real, personal and private property of living souls and are not subjected to your claims of ownership under your criminal frauds against WE THE PEOPLE. Re-read the two maxims of law]


Sec 18. Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crimes, shall ever be tolerated in this State.
Sec 19. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable seizures and searches, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons and things to be seized.


THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
These facts remove all controversy from the matter at hand, thus meaning there is no longer any recourse to a court of law since this NOTICE CEASE AND DESIST, is a PRIMA FACIE CASE. This Notice to Cease and Desist addresses the crimes and violation of OATHS of all subordinate public servants acting under your supervision and includes specifically, all identified in This Notice to Cease and Desist by their ignoring their moral and fiduciary duty. The following stare decisis apply; Hafer v. Melo, 502 US 21 (1991): “US Supreme Court held that state officials acting by ”color of law” may be held personally liable for the injuries or torts they cause and that official or sovereign immunity may not be asserted.”; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 (1974), 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974), “When a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.”; Warnock v Pecos County, Texas, 116 F. 3d 776 – No.96-50869 Summary Calendar. July 3, 1997.
In the Western world and many Eastern countries, each of us was born into the world with a bounty on our heads. This is due to the fact that our federal government considers us as enemies of the state. According to Judge Dale, author of The Great American Adventure: The Secrets of America, if you live in the United States, the act that makes you an enemy of the U.S. federal government is “The Trading with the Enemy Act.” This act was amended by Franklin D. Roosevelt in March 1933.
Even though you are considered an enemy of the corporate government, it actually has no jurisdiction over you as a living man or woman. However, if you agree to be a citizen of your corporate government, then it has jurisdiction over you. For example, to be a United States citizen means that you are an “employee” of the United States which is a corporation. If you want evidence of this, look at subsection 14 & 15 in Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 and you should see this phrase “”(14) “State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States””
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 


In regards to the living man or woman including identities, titles, real, personal and private property, flesh, body, blood, fluids and dna, cannot be patented transferred or sold nor be collateral for any sureties. Re-read the two maxims of law.
These criminal corporations are under new management, controlled by the military and are being completely restructured, removing all the criminals that have committed extreme atrocities against We The People. There are currently over 63,000 sealed indictments, some of which have already begun tribunals. Out of that 63,000 sealed indictments, over 10,000 nearing 11,000, are for California alone. The second largest being held is in Texas.


As promised by the current administration, the swamp is being drained and it is only a short mater of time, all the crimes and evil that has been done for decades to the people of this country will be exposed and the criminals brought to true justice.


ITNJ Testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9dTMyuEHTQ&feature=youtu.be 
The Conspiracy Project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sDSv5WQ1m0&app=desktop 
War Games: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=159&v=3noExmsCRyg 
Vaccines are designed to kill us: https://i-uv.com/whistleblower-dr-judy-mikovits-11-minutes-that-blew-me-away/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IUv+%28I+UV%29 
Outlaw vaccines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir8k18GP_3Y&feature=youtu.be 
Num exposes damage by nano tech and more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boBdrbODm3s 
Truth TV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEpoYqQO4DE&feature=youtu.be 
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CAFR ACCOUNT: https://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD/CAFR/cafr17web.pdf 


Credit where Credit is Due
Let’s give credit where credit is due. Hundreds of thousands of souls that live only by reality, truth, honor and integrity, suffering great hardships to the extreme of losing their lives have gone before us to ensure we have stored in posterity the truth of what has and continues to occur in our world.
It has become my great honor through my own great suffering and loss, to pass on a small portion of what they brought forward for us to find.
It is my hope that all who find my voice speaking out, will pick up the torch and assist in this fight to save lives, our world and the next generations to follow our lead.
Facing the truth should not be a hard thing and yet it is the only thing that stops so many of us from living a life of honor and integrity. A shallow life lived is an empty life indeed.
May we all wake up and expose the terrors and corruption that has and continues to destroy the beauty this life should’ve been, in the hopes we can destroy the evil and bring into reality that which this planet and all her inhabitants truly have to offer. Many blessings, may they flow eternally unbroken, Nikki G.
Posted by Soaring Spirit at 6:16:00 AM 

Please take a look at the bottom email link on the post Comsec to me, you will see it is to music center now take a look at the post Jeff claims Destry sent to me. Jeff claims he blocked out my email but there is no email of mine I do not have a music center email. My email is: soaringspirit@therapist.net so again this man seeks only to deceive. there is from and a to music center and there is a from and a to content manager. I am neither of these.

Here is the truevine

website: http://www.truevine.net/ They are an internet filter a christian service.

You can create web sites, emails, dsl etc., I have no content with this site.


Jeff claims Anna does not date her articles please notice as you click pauls links Anna's articles are dated. I really don't know whats wrong with this guy but clearly he has issues.

T-5333
POTUS Tweet
Donald J. Trump24 Apr 2019 - 7:09:35 AM

Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump

I didn’t call Bob Costa of the Washington Post, he called me (Returned his call)! Just more Fake News.

48.1K
7:09 AM - Apr 24, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

26.8K people are talking about this





T-5328
POTUS Tweet
Donald J. Trump24 Apr 2019 - 5:10:06 AM

Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump

The Mueller Report, despite being written by Angry Democrats and Trump Haters, and with unlimited money behind it ($35,000,000), didn’t lay a glove on me. I DID NOTHING WRONG. If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court. Not only......

69.3K
5:10 AM - Apr 24, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

39.7K people are talking about this




Interesting thought: You attack those you fear the most!


Well that explains this hit job on me and Anna quite well, but what the hell do they fear? TRUTH?

We Three "Laoch Bean" Warrior Woman

       Mother Daughter Granddaughter 

There is only ONE THING-ONE LAW that has true value, that truly MATTERS, and without it only HELL exists:
LOVE and DO NO HARM
Only LOVE has value because without it we will always suffer at the hand of another.
Only LOVE holds the honor needed to keep the only LAW that matters:
DO NO HARM
If you have the capacity to truly LOVE you would NEVER harm another, you would NEVER steal, you would NEVER covet that which IS NOT YOURS, you would NEVER lie, you would NEVER get behind the wheel and drive drunk or on drugs or be so tired that you would fall asleep, you would NEVER kidnap a child and commit atrocities against them and the list goes on as to what is occurring in our world today.
LOVE, YOU WOULD NEVER DO ANY HARM AGAINST ANOTHER.
SO, WHO ARE YOU? WHAT COMES OUT OF YOUR MOUTH AND YOUR ACTIONS? DO YOU CAUSE HARM? OR IS EVERY WORD FROM YOUR MOUTH AND EVERY ACTION FROM YOUR BODY AN ACT OF HARM AGAINST ANOTHER OR AN ACT OF LOVE?
Matthew 7:16-18
16, But by their fruits you will recognize them…
17, Even so every good tree yields good fruit, but every bad tree yields bad fruit.
18, A good tree cannot yield bad fruit; neither can a bad tree yield good fruit.

BabyJay singing "I can't make you love me"  Live